Pineapple cover artwork Pineapple print cover artwork

The Pineapple

Ordinary life · Wider world

Better Than It Needs To Be

Issue 36 — 6 November 2026
Issue 36 — 6 November 2026
Better Than It Needs To Be

Inside this issue

  1. 01 In This Issue In This Issue.
  2. 02 Editorial Better Than It Needs to Be
  3. 03 Feature You Can Call the Teacher “Alejandro”?
  4. 04 Postcards Canary Islands, Spain.
  5. 05 Member Stories The Work Between the Coffees.
  6. 06 Voices Voices – A new section in the Pineapple.
  7. 07 Column The Joys of Election Week (And the Great Braai Debate)
  8. 08 At The Table The Minutes Before Anything Starts.
  9. 09 Member Stories A Holiday With No Time to Be Bored.
  10. 10 Member Stories The Basics Came From My Mother.
  11. 11 Member Stories The People You Can Count On.
  12. 12 At The Table The People Who Make Life a Little Better.
  13. 13 At The Table Five Minutes Between Two Worlds.
  14. 14 Essay AI Is for Everyone. But It Is Still Only an Assistant.
  15. 15 Member Stories A Little More Light for Winter.
  16. 16 Recipe Ralf’s Grünkohl mit Pinkel
  17. 17 Peeling Potatoes Fruitloop University Has Got Talent. Eventually.
  18. 18 In The Next Issue Tiny Luxuries
The Pineapple Published weekly in Cleebourg, France.
Publisher and Director of Publication: Frank Peters
Editor - Janita Le Grange, South Africa
brida.eu/pineapple
ISSN 3131-8541
In This Issue

In This Issue.

In This Issue.

Sometimes, the best moments in life are the ones that quietly catch us by surprise. A peaceful ten minutes with a morning coffee before the household wakes up, a silly radio pop quiz shared on the school run, or a quick laugh with a complete stranger in the supermarket aisle. These small delights don’t require grand plans or special occasions—they are simply the everyday things that turn out better than they needed to be. In this issue, we celebrate the tiny, ordinary pleasures that make our days brighter, warmer, and infinitely more enjoyable.

In this issue, we explore:

Over in The Work Between the Coffees, Alexander takes us behind the scenes of a salesperson’s working day, featuring hundreds of kilometres on the road, conversations over coffee, and customers who sometimes say no without explaining why.

Sarah took this week’s feature with You Can Call the Teacher “Alejandro”?, where a school exchange in the Canary Islands brings unfamiliar timetables, four competing languages, and some surprising classroom customs as she discovers that normal can look very different elsewhere. This is accompanied by Canary Islands, Spain in our Postcards section, where she shares glimpses of her island adventure—from winding streets and Atlantic surfers to a colourful mural and a visiting butterfly.

Launching our new section Voices—which brings one question, different lives, and unexpected answers—Pavel tells us about one of his everyday pleasures in Belarus.

In The Joys of Election Week (And the Great Braai Debate), Fruitloop takes us along for the experience of election day in South Africa, which means voting queues, technical frustrations, plenty of jokes, and, naturally, a braai.

Meanwhile, in The Minutes Before Anything Starts, Atlantic Corridor’s Ismar in Brazil and Ritesh in India take us into the little moments before dancing, Pilates, and the working day begin, where two very different routines reveal some unexpected habits.

Sylvie shares a packed week off in A Holiday With No Time to Be Bored, featuring a 95-kilometre bicycle ride, sparkling windows, family celebrations, and twelve hours helping at the tennis club.

Ralf invites us into his kitchen in The Basics Came From My Mother for a trip to the butcher, two kinds of Pinkel, a treasured knife, and a pot of slow-cooked kale, where even the leftovers are worth looking forward to. This is paired directly with Ralf’s Grünkohl mit Pinkel in Ralf’s Kitchen, where he shares his method for a traditional northern German winter favourite with kale, smoked meats, sausages, and crispy potatoes that might taste even better tomorrow.

Fabrice explores trust in The People You Can Count On, asking what makes somebody valuable in a workplace, friendship, or club, and discovering that being good company and being dependable aren’t necessarily the same thing.

At the Lunch table, The People Who Make Life a Little Better explores an enthusiastic birthday song, Brazilian pizza, memorable personalities, and a little Fruitloop nonsense as they look at the people who make ordinary gatherings more enjoyable.

In Five Minutes Between Two Worlds, Swimming Club colleagues Manfred and Martin examine their small daily rituals: Manfred chooses the first five minutes of his working day, while Martin chooses the last, proving that ten ordinary minutes can hold quite a few surprises.

Babette welcomes the colder months in A Little More Light for Winter with handmade lanterns, fairy lights, Christmas films, and plans for a wooden tree.

Bruce, Frank, and AI researcher Abbas Rzayev from Azerbaijan ask whether artificial intelligence can recognise the emotions hidden in song lyrics, beginning with music and poetry before exploring what machines can do—and where human judgement still matters.

Fruitloop University hosts a chaotic competition in Fruitloop University Has Got Talent. Eventually., where five extraordinary contestants compete for the Golden Pineapple, but none has quite the same understanding of punctuality as Fruitloop and the Mayor attempt to keep the competition under control.

Finally, looking ahead in Tiny Luxuries, we explore the good butter, hidden chocolate, fresh sheets, and quiet coffees that make everyday life feel special next week.

Welcome to Pineapple 36—find a warm, cozy spot (or a cool, shaded corner if you’re down here in the Southern Hemisphere!), grab a steaming hot chocolate topped with marshmallows, and enjoy life from someone else’s point of view!



Editorial

Better Than It Needs to Be

Ever sat back and thought, this is better than I expected ? Ordered a coffee from a new coffee shop. Tried a pretzel covered in chocolate. Or maybe tasted a meal you’d never had before.

Better Than It Needs to Be

Imagine this: Waking up in the early morning, when the house is entirely quiet and all you can hear is the birds chirping outside. You get up, walk to the kitchen, and start making your coffee.

Then, taking a seat in your favorite chair, holding a hot mug of coffee with ten minutes all to yourself and your own thoughts. Just you and your coffee. This is my small delight. It’s not something I get to do all the time, because mornings can be a whirlwind of finding shoes, packing school lunches, and making sure everyone—including yourself—is decent enough to leave the house. But that is besides the point.

My son and I have another small, daily delight. Listening to the radio, oldies or 80s music playing, and joining in on the morning pop quiz. We try to answer the questions alongside the contender and hope they get ten out of ten, because we certainly never would—our top score thus far is a modest five!

Another small delight is going into a supermarket or a public place and running into someone who offers a smile, a nod, or even a joke about something mundane. Expensive toilet paper, pricey coffee, or just complaining about egg prices. For some, it is a small delight to talk to a complete stranger, and sometimes it is my small delight, walking away with a smile over a shared human experience.

Sometimes there is a tiny little delight in our lives that makes everything better, keeps us moving, and keeps us happy. Your favorite drink, your favorite shoes, your favorite place, or even a good exercise session.

Maybe your small delight isn’t even something physical. Maybe it is a smell, a sound, the sight of the first autumn leaves, the first snow falling, or blossoms bursting to life in spring.

A person can also be a small delight. Some people have the innate ability to make a room better, bring life to a conversation, or completely change the atmosphere in a difficult situation. They are the small delights we didn’t even know we needed.

This is our new topic for November: Small delights. What is your small delight? Is it the first five minutes at the start of a working day? Is it having your favorite coffee in the morning? Or do you have something else to spoil yourself with that you would like to share with us?

Welcome to Pineapple 36, where small delights meet us in everyday life. Sit back, relax, and let’s find the beauty in the little things together!

You Can Call the Teacher “Alejandro”?
Feature

You Can Call the Teacher “Alejandro”?

An exchange trip to the Canary Islands gives Sarah a new school, four languages competing in her head, a few unexpected rules, and one very important question: who decided that respect needs a title?

I have been in the Canary Islands for only a few days, and already I have discovered something very interesting. You can travel from France to Spain, go to school, eat sandwiches, speak four languages, and suddenly realise that things you thought were completely normal are not normal everywhere.

And honestly, I think that’s really cool.

First, I was just happy about the weather. I could wear T-shirts and shorts! In France, we are going towards winter, so being somewhere warm is really, really nice. But before I could enjoy that, I had to survive the flight.

I was a little bit stressed because it was my first time travelling like this, with a big suitcase and everything. Then my phone decided to make the situation more complicated. My ticket said I would arrive at 11:35, but my phone was showing a different time. I started wondering whether I was on the correct flight.

What happened?

Of course, it was the time difference. Everything was fine. But when you’re travelling somewhere new, even the clock can make you question your life.

And that was only the beginning.

My second day at school was really interesting because the timetable is so different from France.

We finish at 2:30 in the afternoon. When I discovered that, I thought, is this a joke? A prank? Because in France, that feels like my Wednesday, when we have a shorter school day. But here, it’s normal.

Then we eat lunch at about three o’clock.

Three!

It changes the whole rhythm of the day. Dinner can be around eight or nine in the evening, and during the morning we can eat sandwiches. There is also a little shop at school where students can buy food, drinks and candy. In France, we have vending machines, but not really the same thing.

The school also has a football field, and there are pigeons on it. Not just one or two. I think there were about ten.

I was like, you have pigeons at your high school? We don’t have pigeons at my high school!

The buildings are interesting too. There is an older building and a newer one. Some parts of the older building are not in very good condition, and some sections of the roof are missing. The tables are also quite old. I think perhaps the school has decided to spend money on other things because they have the newer building, and the roof is not necessarily the biggest emergency.

But the biggest difference for me was not the timetable, the food, the buildings or even the pigeons.

It was the teachers.

In France, we call our teachers Monsieur or Madame. We don’t just use their first names.

Here, students can call their teachers by their names.

For example, if a teacher is called Alejandro, the students just say, “Alejandro.”

That’s it.

No Monsieur. No Madame. No special title.

I was so surprised because if I did that in France, I think my teacher would tell me to get out of the classroom!

But here, it seems completely normal.

And the interesting thing is that I actually like it.

I don’t think it means the students don’t respect their teachers. The teachers still have authority. If students are talking too much, the teacher can tell them to stop. There are still rules, and the students still have to listen.

But the relationship feels different.

The teachers call us by our first names, so why shouldn’t we call them by theirs? Of course, we are not the same age, and we don’t have exactly the same position. But I think there can still be respect when people speak to each other in a more equal way.

Janita said it was a little like our relationship. She is older than me, but I don’t call her Teacher Janita or Mrs Janita.

Oh no. That would be so weird!

I think she agrees with me about that.

And it made me wonder whether some things we call respect are actually just habits we have learned.

Another interesting thing about being an exchange student is that I am learning Spanish while trying to remember my French, German and English.

Sometimes I mix everything.

I start a sentence in English, then a Spanish word arrives, then I remember something in German, and suddenly I don’t know which language I’m speaking anymore.

Even in my English conversation with Janita, I found myself saying, “¿Cómo se dice?” when I wanted to know a word.

Sorry. Wrong language!

At school, I had a French class, which was really funny because I already speak French. But the teacher told me and David, the other exchange student, that while the Spanish students do their exercises in French, we must do ours in Spanish.

But the teacher told me and David, the other exchange student, that while the Spanish students do their exercises in French, we must do ours in Spanish.

So everybody is learning, just in opposite directions.

It’s difficult because I don’t have a lot of Spanish vocabulary yet. With some teachers, I can speak English or French, but with others, I have to try Spanish.

I also did an English listening evaluation. Here, marks are out of ten instead of twenty, and I got seven.

Woo!

Okay, it’s not the best mark in the world, but it’s not bad. I was proud because I could understand enough to do the test.

And something else has started happening that makes me really happy.

Sometimes I think in English.

Normally, when I speak to myself, I speak French. French, French, French. But occasionally an English thought arrives without me translating it first.

When that happens, I’m really proud of myself.

Even if my brain sometimes feels like four languages are having a meeting without inviting me.

After talking about my new school, Janita started asking me questions about rules.

Not only the official rules, like keeping your phone in your pocket during lessons, but the strange rules nobody really writes down.

For example, why do we have to be serious when we are doing something important?

I think that when I write an exam, I need to concentrate. If I want good results, I have to put my energy into my work. And for me, being serious helps me concentrate.

But then Janita asked another question.

Why can a famous fashion designer wear pyjamas and everybody calls it fashion, while an ordinary student wearing pyjamas to school might be called lazy?

I think social media and famous people influence us a lot. Sometimes we decide that if somebody famous does something, it must be better.

But why?

They are human, like us. Maybe somebody is a very good actor and makes wonderful films. That’s really cool. But it doesn’t mean everything that person does is automatically better than what we do.

I think we create many of these rules ourselves because we decide certain people are more important.

And then we all start following them.

Janita also asked why talking to yourself is considered strange, but talking to your cat is normal.

I think we have learned to associate talking to yourself with being a little crazy. People repeat that idea, and eventually it becomes something everybody believes.

But I talk to myself sometimes.

And I’m not crazy!

At least, I don’t think so.

Of course, Janita couldn’t ask only normal questions.

She imagined a zebra arriving at a horse competition and being disqualified because it had stripes.

Was that discrimination or a fashion problem?

For me, discrimination.

Because the zebra cannot change its stripes. If the competition is about ability, why should its appearance automatically stop it from participating?

I tried to explain this using an example of racial discrimination between people. I was a little nervous about choosing the correct words because I didn’t want to say something problematic.

But the idea was simple. If somebody is capable of participating, excluding that person because of skin colour is discrimination.

The zebra made the question funny, but the problem behind it was serious.

Then we had a sheep who didn’t want to follow the flock because he wanted to become a rock star.

Was he brave, selfish or just very noisy?

Brave. Definitely brave.

I think it’s really difficult to do something when the people around you don’t support it. Many famous people talk about how, at the beginning, others didn’t believe in what they wanted to do.

But if you always wait for everybody to love what you do, you will never move forward.

You will just stay attached to what other people think about you.

And I think that is very difficult, especially when the people involved are your family. If I really wanted to do something and my family didn’t agree, it would be so, so hard for me.

So yes, I think the rock-star sheep is courageous.

Even if his singing is terrible.

Janita also imagined that school rules had been invented 200 years ago by a man who hated children.

Would I still follow them?

No.

For me, school has to be a safe environment where we can learn things that will help us later in life. Rules should help us learn better, not exist just to make students unhappy.

Of course, I understand that we need rules. We cannot do absolutely everything we want. But I think we should be able to question rules and adapt them when they don’t help us.

Then an alien arrived in our imaginary conversation.

The alien discovered that parents can tell children to go to bed, but children cannot tell parents to go to bed. He thought this was a dictatorship.

I could understand his point a little bit, but I also understand that parents have more experience and children don’t always have the maturity to make every decision themselves.

Still, I once tried telling my mother that if I had to go to bed, she had to go too.

But she had a computer in her bedroom, so she could watch Netflix after going to bed.

That’s cheating!

Then Janita invented a toothbrush that refused to brush my teeth unless I brushed them first.

Please. That makes no sense.

My first solution was to use my finger because I actually did that once at Scouts when I forgot my toothbrush but still had toothpaste. It works as an emergency solution, but I wouldn’t want to do it all the time.

My second solution was to have a discussion with the toothbrush.

I think it might feel a little hurt at the beginning, but communication is important when you want to solve a problem.

Even with a toothbrush, apparently.

We also discussed changing birthday traditions so that instead of receiving presents, you have to give presents to everybody else.

I prefer receiving presents, thank you very much. It’s my birthday!

But if the tradition really changed, I already have a solution. I could give away the presents I don’t like.

For example, some really, really ugly socks.

What a pleasure to give you this wonderful gift!

One of the funny things about this conversation was that I was learning about rules while living somewhere that follows different ones.

In the Canary Islands, I have to adapt to a different school timetable, different mealtimes, different ways of speaking to teachers and different expectations.

I also have to follow the rule about phones at school, even though it is sometimes difficult because I need my phone for schoolwork. My French school uses an application for books, exercises, messages and timetables, but I cannot access it properly while I am here. I may have to ask friends in France to send me the work.

So sometimes a rule makes sense, but it still creates a problem.

And sometimes a rule that feels strange at first can actually be quite nice.

Like calling a teacher Alejandro.

I don’t think every rule is bad. I need to concentrate during exams. I understand why parents make decisions for children. I think schools should have rules that keep students safe and help them learn.

But I also think we should be allowed to ask why a rule exists.

Because if the only answer is that everybody has always done it that way, maybe we should think a little more.

Canary Islands, Spain.
Postcards

Canary Islands, Spain.

Receiving a glimpse of another corner of the world right in the middle of an ordinary week is a delight in itself. This week, Sarah brings us along on her student exchange journey to the Canary Islands!

Through her lens, we get a taste of everyday island life—from narrow, winding streets that dip down toward mist-covered hills, to dramatic panoramic views over local rooftops framed by rolling clouds. She snapped a magnificent wall mural honoring local farmers carrying their harvest, caught surfers gliding across the dark Atlantic waves, and captured a quiet, magical moment where a vibrant blue butterfly landed right on her hand.

The Work Between the Coffees.
Member Stories

The Work Between the Coffees.

Sales can look like driving, small talk and drinking coffee. The real work is everything happening underneath.

By Alexander, Germany

If you travelled with me for one working day but were not allowed to come into the customer meetings, you might have a very boring day.

You would see a lot of Bavarian countryside.

On a normal travelling day, I can drive 400 to 600 kilometres. Often I drive 150 or 250 kilometres just to reach one customer. Between appointments I make phone calls, listen to music and keep moving. Sometimes the travelling takes longer than the meetings themselves.

From outside, it can look strange. You drive for hours, sit with a customer, drink a coffee, talk for a while and then drive home again.

It can look very unproductive.

But that is my job.

I need to see my customers face-to-face. Teams and Zoom are useful, but they are different. When you want to build a relationship, sitting opposite somebody still matters.

And sometimes the result of a meeting does not come immediately.

I can have a meeting today about our strategy for next year and sell nothing because of it today. Maybe I will not sell anything because of it next week either. But if we agree to do more activities together next year, that can create sales much later.

That is one of the difficult things about sales. The work and the result do not always happen at the same time.

Before a meeting, I normally want to know a few things. How is the customer doing personally? How was the year for the company? What do our sales figures look like? Which products are selling? What do I want to do with this customer next year?

I prepare the sales figures by month and by product. I look at what is happening in our company. I think about a strategy. I decide what I want to discuss.

And then I have to be ready for the customer to say no.

That is when the plan changes.

There are basically two kinds of meeting.

Sometimes there is a problem and we have to solve it. Sometimes there is no problem, and we talk about the year, the products and how we can grow together.

Normally I go into the meeting with an idea.

But the customer can simply say, “No, we cannot do that.”

Then I need another idea.

Most of the time, I find that quite easy. You have to stay open. Your own plan is not automatically the right plan. If the customer explains why something will not work, you have to think about another way.

If the customer explains why something will not work, you have to think about another way.

Sometimes I do not have the answer immediately. Then that is also okay. I go away, think about it and come back at the next meeting with something different.

That part of sales interests me. I like creating a strategy and asking what we could do next with a customer.

Sending somebody two product data sheets is not very exciting. Creating a way to grow a customer is different.

The detective work becomes more interesting when somebody says no.

A clear no is actually quite easy.

If somebody tells me, “I already have a product I trust, I have a good relationship with the supplier and I do not want to change,” then I understand the situation. I can have a cheaper product or, in my opinion, the better product, but it does not matter.

I can say: no problem. If something changes later, remember me.

The harder situation is when somebody first appears interested. You demonstrate the product. The price works. The product works. Everything seems positive.

And then the answer is still no.

Now I want to understand why.

Is it the price? Is it the product? Is it me? Is it the distributor? Is there another relationship in the background? Is there something the customer is not telling me?

That is much more difficult.

I had one of those conversations recently. From my side, everything suggested that the customer could change products. In the end, he did not.

I asked why because I wanted to understand it, but I still did not find the real reason.

For me, that means I made a mistake somewhere in the sales conversation. Normally, if somebody is genuinely open to changing, there is a reason behind the final decision. My job is to find it.

Sometimes I cannot.

There is another part of sales that is easy to misunderstand.

I often begin by asking how things are going privately.

From a purely business point of view, that information may only be “nice to have.” I do not need to know every detail of somebody’s private life to sell a product.

But relationships are not purely business.

If we discover that we have had the same problem, the same experience or something else in common, the conversation changes. We can talk differently. The customer sees that I am interested in more than the next order.

That matters.

The point is not to fake interest. It is to create a relationship where both sides know each other well enough to speak openly.

That makes the business conversation easier too.

Strategy is also not something I invent from nothing.

I learn from what works elsewhere.

Recently I spent a lot of time travelling with people from one distributor and visiting end users together. I met many different people and saw much more clearly how that distributor works, how its salespeople operate and how its customers think.

That gave me ideas.

Now I can take the basic approach that worked there and ask whether part of it could work with another distributor. Not 100 percent the same strategy, because the companies are different. But perhaps 80 percent of the foundation.

That is how I think about sales.

You see something working in one place. You understand why it works. Then you ask whether you can adapt it somewhere else.

The numbers are important because, in the end, sales is still sales. But the numbers do not tell you what to do next. For that, you need the conversations, the relationships and the experience behind them.

Sales does not always have a good reputation.

People see the long trips in the company car. They see the coffee with the customer. They see the small talk.

What they do not see is how difficult it can be to sell a more expensive product when there are many competitors. They do not see the strategy inside the conversation, or how differently you have to speak with different people.

They do not see what happens when the customer does not follow your plan.

And they do not see the pressure when you have a bad month — or several bad months.

I had a difficult sales year for a long time. Then, during the last couple of months, the numbers changed strongly.

I had invested a lot of time in travelling with customers, meeting end users and doing things outside my normal comfort zone. Suddenly the results became much better.

Can I prove that every extra sale came because of those activities? No.

But I can see what changed after I invested that time.

And that gives me something to work with.

Now I want to take what worked, repeat it somewhere else and see whether the improvement continues.

Of course, sales has one small joke built into it.

You can have two very good months, feel happy about the progress, look at the target for the next month — and immediately think: That is going to be difficult.

Then the detective work starts again.

Voices – A new section in the Pineapple.
Voices

Voices – A new section in the Pineapple.

One question. Many lives.

Ask six people the same question and you’ll probably get six different answers. Some will make you smile. Others might surprise you. Occasionally, someone will say something that makes you reconsider what you thought you knew.

Now imagine asking that question in different parts of the world.

That’s the idea behind Voices, our new section in The Pineapple.

Every week at Brida, our conversations revolve around a particular theme. We thought it might be interesting to take one question from that theme and send it a little further afield.

Beyond our Tables. Beyond the people we already know.

The answers might come from someone in Belarus, a shopkeeper in Baku, a retired teacher in Germany or somebody going about an ordinary Wednesday somewhere we’ve never visited.

We don’t know what they’ll say. That’s rather the point.

Some answers will be thoughtful, others funny, unexpected or wonderfully ordinary. They won’t necessarily agree with one another, and we certainly don’t intend to tidy them up into a single conclusion.

We’ll simply bring some of those voices together and let you discover the people behind them.

Because sometimes a few words from somebody you’ve never met can stay with you long after you’ve finished reading.

And to begin, we travel to Belarus.


What everyday thing in your life brings you way more joy than it should?

“What everyday thing in your life brings you way more joy than it should?” is not easy, because what is everyday thing for me is not an everyday thing for many other people. My answer is “reading books”, it’s a kind of escapism, I read a lot, but mostly stupid (OK, not so stupid) SF&F written by Russians 😉 it becomes harder and harder to find new books, new authors which are not bullshit – but they still exist, people still write books.and some of them are still good.


The Joys of Election Week (And the Great Braai Debate)
Column

The Joys of Election Week (And the Great Braai Debate)

In South Africa, the 4th of November is election day . Voting day. A very important day in our calendar—so important that it is declared a public holiday .

Not many people go to work. Most companies close their doors, and even the ones that have to stay open, like local supermarkets, shut down early so everyone gets a fair, uninterrupted chance to cast their ballot.

Are we voting for the president today? No. We are voting for district, local municipalities, and individual wards to decide who will represent each part of the council. It’s the foundational stuff—the local mechanics that eventually shape the outcome of future national elections.

So, the whole country made plans to head out to the voting stations, set up in schools and public places in every town.

And then, right after voting comes the thing South Africans love most: having a braai.

By early afternoon, the whole neighborhood smells like wood smoke and burning charcoal, carrying on into the late afternoon and deep into the evening. It feels almost like celebrating the election results before the polls even close. At that point, it doesn’t even matter who won the political race. What actually matters is what kind of meat you’ve got sizzling on the braai, whether there’s pap and tomato relish, a proper potato salad, or golden, toasted braaibroodjies.

Getting to the front of that queue, however, is an entirely different story.

Some people lucked out with stations that took thirty minutes, in and out. Other lines took an hour.

Our master plan was to arrive right at 7:00 AM when the doors opened. Of course, we ran a little late because certain household members—whom I will graciously leave unnamed—are simply not morning people and prefer to sleep in just a bit on their day off.

When we finally arrived, the real fun began. Figuring out which queue to join according to alphabetical surnames, listening to people passionately debate whether this “new” system is actually an improvement or a disaster, and exchanging small talk with strangers.

Someone in the line even cracked a joke: “Oh, sorry, we’re offline.”

At first, the line moved steadily. We were thrilled with our progress. Even though we were shuffling forward just one agonizing space at a time, movement is movement.

Until it wasn’t.

We stood there, completely frozen in place for what felt like hours. And right on cue, that casual joke about the system being offline? It became our reality.

We stood there much longer than anyone reasonably should have. But we chose to stay. We were already too invested, too close to the front to abandon ship. We weren’t at the back of the queue anymore; we were almost there, tantalizingly close, yet sitting just out of reach.

Eventually, we got it done and headed home. I’ll admit, I felt a sharp pang of jealousy hearing that the rest of my family breezed through their voting stations in thirty minutes while we aged ten years in a digital gridlock. But you can’t win them all.

The best part of the whole ordeal, honestly, was the digital build-up leading up to election day.

Eat your vegetables this week, don’t vote for them.

Vote first, braai later.

Mark the right block—you are not ordering pizza.

The memes, the endless jokes, the WhatsApp broadcasts. South Africans are simply not serious people. We can find the absolute humor in any situation, no matter how frustrating or bureaucratic.

And honestly? That is what makes living in this country so remarkably amazing.

But tonight, the fires are burning, the meat is on the grill, and the ballot is cast.

The Minutes Before Anything Starts.
At The Table

The Minutes Before Anything Starts.

What happens before the class, before the meeting and before we finally become the person we are supposed to be that day?

By Ismar, Campo Grande, Brazil and Ritesh, Bangalore, India.

Ismar’s mother is ready for Pilates ninety minutes early.

Not almost ready. Ready.

Sometimes she tells him so. Sometimes he simply notices her sitting on the sofa, prepared to leave, with everything beside her. She may do a crossword. She may look at her phone. But as far as the important business of the afternoon is concerned, she is finished.

The Pilates studio is about three kilometres away. By car, the journey takes perhaps ten minutes. This makes no difference.

“She always wants to go somewhere a long time in advance,” Ismar says. “‘It’s better to wait there. Let’s go, let’s go.’”

He does not share the enthusiasm. Ismar gets himself ready around ten minutes before they leave.

Between them sit eighty minutes of completely different philosophy.

It is a small domestic scene, but once you start paying attention to the minutes before something begins, they appear everywhere: on sofas, on pavements, in metro stations, beside coffee machines, outside dance classes and in offices before the first meeting.

Most of these moments do not look important.

That may be why they are interesting.

Ismar has another weekly arrival ritual, and it could hardly be more different.

He goes dancing with Amélie. Sometimes they travel separately; sometimes he picks her up by car. A few minutes before arriving, he sends a message.

Three minutes. Five minutes. Nearly there.

By the time he reaches her building, she is ready. “She doesn’t leave me waiting for long,” he says.

His mother is prepared for departure long before departure exists. Amélie appears at almost exactly the right moment. Ismar has a name for his role in this arrangement.

“Normally, I’m her particular chauffeur.”

Then they drive to the class together.

The difference between Pilates and dancing continues after they arrive. Before Pilates there is not much social ceremony. Ismar mostly talks with his mother, and they wait in the exercise area rather than at reception. His teacher is unusually punctual. The class starts on time.

Dancing has another atmosphere. The room is open, with less separation between the place where people arrive and the place where they dance. People gather naturally. Ismar greets almost everyone.

“At the dance, I talk to many people.”

The conversations are ordinary: family, the latest ballroom event, the next one, somebody’s plans. When someone has a birthday, drinks and snacks may appear and the class briefly develops another life around itself. After some classes they go out together, and Ismar says the conversational “repertoire is larger”. Family still appears. Dancing appears. Society may appear. Politics occasionally slips in, although people generally prefer not to stay there for too long.

Ismar has no difficulty moving from one subject to another. If he knows something about it, he joins in. If he does not, he listens.

Asked who talks more when he and Amélie are with other people, his answer slightly surprises the Mayor.

“In a group, I think I talk more.”

When they are alone, Amélie talks more.

There is another surprise. All this sociability does not mean Ismar thinks the conversations are the best part. Asked whether the little conversations around dancing might sometimes be more interesting than the dancing itself, his answer is immediate.

No.

“I think dancing is more interesting than the conversation.”

The reason is simple enough. People generally do not talk about the subjects that interest him most. A philosophical discussion before the music starts would apparently be welcome.

“I think I don’t have any partner for that.”

So the minutes before dancing matter.

But the dancing still wins.

Ritesh’s morning begins with a different kind of preparation.

If you secretly followed him from his home to the office, the first thing you might notice is speed.

“You will see me rushing sometimes.”

His walk to the metro is about 1.2 kilometres. If he is relaxed, it takes perhaps fifteen minutes. If he is running late, he can reduce it to ten.

Then comes the crowd. People cut queues. People try to board quickly. Everybody seems to be in motion. Some disappear into their phones or headphones, physically close to hundreds of other people while mentally somewhere else.

Ritesh watches them.

“Most of the time, I just look at people and I think that I don’t want to do this one.”

His complete journey takes around forty to forty-five minutes, including the walks at both ends. Yet somewhere inside those minutes, the working day has already begun.

His complete journey takes around forty to forty-five minutes, including the walks at both ends.

“When I leave from home, all I think about is work.”

Priorities begin assembling. What has to happen today? What needs attention? What might go wrong?

There is no formal moment when home disappears and work begins. Work simply leaks in.

Home leaks back too. On the last part of the journey, Ritesh sometimes calls his wife and talks with her until he reaches the office.

The two worlds overlap.

At work there is another small border. Ritesh is now on the third floor of a large open-plan office. Near reception there is a coffee machine, vending machines, a table and high chairs. People sit there with coffee, greeting one another and asking about yesterday or the weekend.

It is not yet serious.

Ritesh puts down his bag, gets water or coffee and looks at what is waiting for him.

Then comes the stand-up.

“Until this stand-up is over, I’m not in that serious mood.”

Before it, there is coffee, conversation and a little space. During it, information arrives quickly. The meeting exists to identify blockers and keep work moving. Questions appear. Problems appear. Ritesh can sometimes become caught in one thought while the discussion has already moved somewhere else.

Asked whether the meeting is fun, he does not pretend.

“Not at all.”

Useful, yes.

Fun, no.

The ten minutes beforehand are not simply dead time before the real thing. They have an atmosphere of their own.

Occasionally Ritesh reaches the office very early. Then the open-plan floor is almost empty. There may be security or reception staff, but none of the normal office noise.

He likes that.

He can take a coffee somewhere, watch something without earphones or open one of the courses available through work. He often chooses to learn something.

Other early arrivals have their own routines. Some work. Some drink coffee. Some use their phones. Nowadays, Ritesh says, waiting is easy to fill. There is always something to scroll.

For him, the better version is to use the time deliberately.

For Ismar, waiting before a class depends partly on the room itself. At Pilates, people may remain at reception talking if the teacher has not started, while he and his mother tend to wait inside the exercise area. At dancing, everybody occupies much more of the same space.

“People stay together,” he says. “I think it’s more appropriate to talk.”

A reception area creates one kind of waiting. An open dance floor creates another. An empty office creates another again.

But the room is only part of it.

If somebody recorded the ten minutes before Ismar’s dance class without showing the actual dancing, he already knows roughly what the soundtrack would contain: the previous ballroom dance and the next ballroom dance.

“Eighty percent of the conversation would be about it.”

The larger ballroom events can take place somewhere surprisingly ordinary, even at somebody’s home if there is a large covered area beside the house with enough space for dancing. But the bigger event does not automatically make Ismar more sociable.

At the class, he knows the people.

At the ballroom event, many are strangers.

“I normally don’t talk to them.”

The activity itself does not create connection automatically. Seeing the same people again helps. So does arriving in the same place week after week, until unfamiliar faces become recognisable ones and somebody eventually says something.

Whether anybody then speaks is another matter.

Ritesh finds it relatively easy to move towards work.

Moving away from it is harder.

“Connecting is easy,” he says. “Disconnecting is difficult.”

When he leaves the office, he normally calls his wife to say he is on his way. The call is practical. She knows roughly when he will arrive. Food may be started. She may ask whether he wants something particular to eat or whether anything needs to be bought.

Sometimes Ritesh has an idea of his own.

Flowers. Chocolate. Something small.

The problem is that the idea can disappear beneath whatever is still circulating in his head from work.

“I’m so much involved in what I’m thinking, and I forget that one.”

There are successes. Sometimes he brings home something she likes to eat. Sometimes he remembers the flowers.

But the commute does not reliably wipe the working day away. He tries music. He listens to recorded discussions about social issues that interest him. He uses a setting on his phone that can switch off work-related applications.

Still, work may follow him through the front door.

He can be sitting with his wife while his mind continues working through some scenario from the day. She notices.

“What are you thinking? Something is wrong?”

Nothing is necessarily wrong.

His mind simply has not arrived home yet.

Towards the end of the conversation, Frank asks whether Ismar might notice people differently at his next Pilates or dance class after spending an hour talking about all these small moments.

“If I remember this class discussion,” Ismar says, “I think I observe people more.”

Then he immediately complicates the idea.

Someone has told him that he is very curious about other people’s lives. He asks many questions, and those questions may sometimes make people uncomfortable.

So perhaps observing more does not mean talking more.

“I think it’s not advisable that I talk more.”

It is a very Ismar answer.

He wants to know people better, but he also knows that curiosity can cross lines he does not always see.

Ritesh arrives at almost the same place from the opposite direction. He would like to speak more easily with strangers. He remembers travelling on the metro with somebody from his own workplace. The other man recognised him and started the conversation. Only then did Ritesh realise he had seen him around the office too.

Would Ritesh have approached first?

Probably not.

“I would like to have that kind of skill to start that conversation.”

So one man wonders whether he asks too much.

The other wonders how to begin.

They meet somewhere in the middle.

None of these moments is officially the event.

Ismar’s mother sitting ready on the sofa is not Pilates. The message saying “three minutes” is not dancing. Coffee beside reception is not work. The metro journey is neither home nor quite the office. The conversation after dancing is not the class.

Yet much of the texture of ordinary life seems to gather in precisely these spaces.

Ismar’s dance class becomes partly social because people arrive in the same open room and recognise one another. Pilates feels different. Ritesh’s working day starts somewhere on the walk to the metro, softens briefly over coffee, then becomes serious at the stand-up. Going home reverses the journey, but not necessarily the mind.

Nothing official has happened in those minutes before things begin. The teacher has not started. The meeting has not begun. The music is still quiet.

But people are already changing roles.

Ismar becomes his mother’s Pilates companion, then Amélie’s “particular chauffeur”. Ritesh moves from husband to commuter to colleague, and later has to make the journey back again.

Perhaps that is what makes these minutes so easy to miss.

We think we are waiting for something to start.

Often, it already has.

A Holiday With No Time to Be Bored.
Member Stories

A Holiday With No Time to Be Bored.

From a 95-kilometre bicycle ride to sparkling windows, a tennis club celebration and French cheese at the end of a long day, my week off was full of things to do.

By Sylvie, France.

When I returned to work on Monday, I could certainly not say that I had spent my holiday doing nothing. Every day had something planned. We had jobs to finish at home, family and friends to see, places to visit and a big event at our tennis club.

It was a busy week, but it was a good one. We had some funny moments, we enjoyed ourselves, and even the ordinary jobs gave me a nice feeling when they were finished.

One of those jobs was cleaning all the windows in our house. It might not sound like a holiday activity, but I was very happy when it was done. I like the feeling when everything is clean and in its proper place. Of course, that feeling does not always last very long, especially when other people in the house leave their shoes on the garage floor instead of putting them where they belong!

We began the week with some interesting outings. One day, we visited an exhibition about the Titanic. At the end, there was an opportunity to put on virtual reality glasses, which we decided to try. It was a nice experience, and afterwards we went to a Vietnamese restaurant with our daughter.

On Tuesday, my husband and I went on a big bicycle tour of about 95 kilometres. We also took the opportunity to visit the location of my new office in Germany, where I will be working after our company moves.

The building has enormous windows, from the ceiling right down to the floor. When you stand outside, you can see everything happening inside. I am not sure how comfortable that will be in summer or winter, but we will find out.

There is also the question of parking. We are six people, but the company has rented only three parking spaces. I looked around the nearby streets, but parking there costs about three euros an hour. Perhaps some of us will take public transport. We still have to see how everything will work.

Fortunately, there were other things to enjoy during the holiday.

On Wednesday, we cleaned the windows, and in the evening we visited family. On Friday, we worked in the garden, preparing everything for winter. That evening, we invited two friends to our house, and we had a very interesting discussion about next year’s holiday.

Everybody had different ideas about where we should go. In the end, we decided on Guadeloupe, a French island in the Caribbean.

Four years ago, I visited Martinique, another French Caribbean island, and I enjoyed it very much. Guadeloupe is nearby, so I think it will also be interesting to discover.

We are planning to travel in June, outside the school holidays, when flights should be less expensive. We want to rent two holiday villas with swimming pools, staying in different parts of the island so that we can explore more of it.

My daughters were a little disappointed when they heard about our plans, but this holiday is going to be with our friends.

We also managed to spend a whole Thursday at a spa in Germany. It was a large place with swimming pools, water slides and different saunas. One of the saunas was even built in a tree.

We also managed to spend a whole Thursday at a spa in Germany. It was a large place with swimming pools, water slides and different saunas. One of the saunas was even built in a tree.

There was also an opportunity to go into very cold water, about ten degrees. My husband was brave enough to go in, although not completely. I preferred a cold shower. At least with a shower, I can decide how cold I want the water to be!

The weekend brought another family celebration, with around 160 people. There was music, singing and good food, and we saw relatives and friends we had not seen for years. We finally arrived home at four o’clock in the morning.

So much for a quiet holiday.

Another important part of the week was our annual mussels and fries event at the tennis club.

Every year, our club organises this celebration to raise money. It is an important event because running a tennis club costs money. We have expenses to pay, including the trainers who teach the children, and we need different activities during the year to support the club.

We also participate in the town’s music festival in June, when we prepare tarte flambée, and we sell drinks at the local market during the warmer months.

The mussels and fries day is one of our regular celebrations. This year, we had about 50 fewer guests than last year, but it was still a good event.

There is much more work involved than simply serving the food.

We had two cooks preparing the mussels in enormous pots. Other volunteers helped in the kitchen, worked at the bar, served the guests and took care of everything that needed to be done. Around 30 people helped, including some of the younger tennis players.

And then there were the dishes.

When you have a large celebration, there are so many glasses to wash. Wine glasses, water glasses, beer glasses, glasses for soft drinks and crémant. Even when you have a dishwasher, the glasses still need to be dried and put away.

It is one of those jobs that guests probably do not notice, but somebody has to do it.

We started at half past ten in the morning and stayed until half past ten in the evening. Twelve hours is a long time to work at a celebration, but it did not feel like an unpleasant day.

We were well organised, everybody had something to do, and there was a good atmosphere among the volunteers. We spoke with many people, worked together and enjoyed the company.

When the guests had gone, our group stayed together for a while. We finished some cleaning, sat down, ate together and enjoyed French cheese with red wine.

After twelve hours of work, that was a very nice way to finish the day.

I was asked which job during my holiday had given me the greatest satisfaction when it was finished.

My answer was the windows.

I really was happy when we had cleaned them all. I enjoy seeing the result of a job, especially when the house is clean and everything is in order.

I also like preparing the decorations for a table when we have a family party. With a large celebration, you need to organise everything beforehand. Some food can be prepared in advance, and for a very big party it is better to have somebody helping with the catering. I cannot cook for so many people myself.

But arranging the table is something I enjoy.

At work, satisfaction comes in a different way. Some customers take a long time to pay their invoices, and I know from experience which ones need more attention. Sometimes I send several emails, and if there is no reaction, I telephone them.

When a customer has an order waiting for delivery, it can be easier to encourage payment. After many reminders and a lot of work, I am happy when the money finally arrives.

It is not always an exciting job, but finishing something that has taken time and effort gives me a good feeling.

At home, the windows are clean. At work, the invoice is paid. At the tennis club, the guests have eaten, the glasses are washed and everything is finished.

They are very different jobs, but I appreciate the moment when the work is done.

There is another reason why I enjoy helping at the tennis club.

My husband is involved in the club’s committee, and I am also a member, so helping with events is part of our club life. We are not a very large group, and every person who offers to help is important.

Sometimes there is a lot to do, and of course it is work. But we also laugh, talk and have a good time together.

When I was asked what I remembered most about a satisfying job — doing the work, seeing the finished result or laughing with somebody — I chose laughing with somebody.

That is what makes these occasions enjoyable.

The same is true of our family celebrations. We have a big family and a good relationship with one another. At the recent party, I met people I had not seen for several years. It was nice to have the opportunity to spend time together again.

At the tennis club, it is similar. We work, but we have fun. At the end of the day, we can sit together and enjoy what we have done.

And when another event comes around, we will help again.

As I said during our conversation, “That’s the life of a group.”

My holiday was full of activities, and I enjoyed them. There were interesting outings, good meals, family celebrations, a bicycle ride, a day at the spa and plenty of work around the house.

Now I am back at work, and the next week will probably be busy again.

Perhaps this weekend will be a little quieter. I have not made many plans yet, although we might go out for a meal with our daughter.

But if my youngest daughter comes home, I am quite sure it will not be quiet for very long.

The Basics Came From My Mother.
Member Stories

The Basics Came From My Mother.

Grünkohl mit Pinkel begins with a drive to the butcher, gets better every time it is reheated, and carries something much older than the recipe itself.

By Ralf, the Grillmeister, Germany.

If you came to my house and said, “Ralf, make me the Ralf dish,” I know what I would do.

First, I would get in the car.

For me, Grünkohl mit Pinkel does not really begin with the pot. It begins at the butcher. I drive to my favourite butcher in Bremerhaven and stand there looking at what he has. I need Kassler, smoked bacon, smoked sausages and Pinkel, but even then I am looking around because perhaps there is something else.

This is dangerous.

I can go there with a perfectly good plan and suddenly see Kassler spare ribs. Then I ask, “What is this?” He explains it to me, and of course I say, “Give it to me.”

Now the plan has already changed.

That is part of cooking for me.

Grünkohl mit Pinkel is a northern German winter dish: kale cooked slowly with meat and sausages, served with potatoes. There are different versions depending on where you come from. Even between Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein, people start arguing about whether the potatoes should be sweet, whether the kale should be sweet, which meat belongs inside and which Pinkel is the correct Pinkel.

I solve the Pinkel problem very simply.

I buy both.

I like Bremer Pinkel and Oldenburger Pinkel because they are different. One is fattier, one has more meat, and they behave differently when you cook them. The Pinkel itself does not go directly into my kale. I let it simmer separately in hot water because a lot of fat comes out. Later, I take a little of that cooking liquid and add it back to the kale.

The kale cooks slowly with onions, smoked meat, mustard and the other ingredients. The small potatoes are cooked first and later made crispy in butter.

And yes, there is garlic.

Not twenty cloves. I am not completely crazy.

Two small cloves.

In our kitchen we have fresh garlic, dried garlic, garlic powder, even Chinese solo garlic. If you ask me how you know when a recipe has become a Ralf recipe, garlic is normally a good place to start.

In our kitchen we have fresh garlic, dried garlic, garlic powder, even Chinese solo garlic.

Unless we are making chocolate pudding.

Probably.

There is another part.

Before I cut anything, I have to choose the knife.

Somebody else looks at the vegetables and thinks, “What shall I cook?”

I can spend five minutes thinking, “Which knife shall I use?”

This is a serious decision.

I own one knife that I would never replace. My nephew gave it to me several years ago. A craftsman had made it for him as part of an exchange, and one day my nephew phoned me, came by train to see me and handed me this knife.

It was made by hand, and for me there is nothing better.

You can always buy another knife. You can buy a more expensive one, a newer one, one with beautiful advertising and perhaps a box that tells you it will change your life.

I don’t need it.

I have the good one.

There is also a vegetable cutter in my kitchen that has earned exactly the same status, although our relationship started badly. I had bought one of those television kitchen gadgets before and hated it. It was terrible. So when I saw another machine recommended by barbecue people I followed online, I was suspicious.

I bought it because I could send it back.

I never sent it back.

Pepper: bam.

Cucumber: bam.

Tomato: bam.

Onion: finished, and no tears.

If it breaks, I will buy another one immediately.

That is also how I recognise the good one. You stop looking for an upgrade.

Next weekend, friends are coming to us.

They could have chosen a restaurant. We could have had a barbecue. They had a choice, and they chose my Grünkohl.

For me, that is already part of the pleasure.

The atmosphere does not begin when everybody sits at the table. It begins when I drive to the butcher. It continues while I am choosing the meat, finding something unexpected, preparing everything, deciding which knife I need and slowly filling the house with the smell of the food.

Then the big plate comes to the table.

Kale. Kassler. Bacon. Sausages. Pinkel. Potatoes.

Maybe some Kassler spare ribs have accidentally joined the party because I went shopping without adult supervision.

There must also be beer. Grünkohl is not really wine food.

Afterwards, many people around here would drink Korn. I don’t like Korn. I think it is horrible. Instead, I prefer a herbal digestif we call Tante Ella. It smells a little of vanilla and, after this meal, it seems to put everything back where it belongs: fat on the right, potatoes on the left, kale in the middle.

Medical science may have another explanation.

I prefer mine.

The wonderful thing about Grünkohl is that Saturday is not the end of it.

Saturday is good.

Sunday is better.

Monday can be fantastic.

Every time the kale is warmed again, something happens to it. The flavours come together more and more. At first I serve it in the traditional way with potatoes. Later, the leftover potatoes can go into a pan until they are crisp, then the cold kale and pieces of meat go in with them.

Everything heats together.

By the third or fourth serving, you have something that is no longer quite the same meal you started with.

For me, this is not a problem.

This is the reward.

I do something similar when I cook other food. If there is a little Chinese food left the next day, perhaps I add prawns. Then maybe some leek. The meal moves. It becomes something else.

I don’t like throwing good food away when it can still become interesting.

Ira has her own favourites.

If she can choose winter food, there will be turnips. There will be lentil soup. Pea soup. Potato soup.

Soup, soup, soup, soup.

This is actually very practical for me. I can cook a big pot. We eat it for two days, and some can go into the refrigerator. If I am away, she can warm it up herself in the evening.

Sometimes the simple things are exactly the right things.

One of the easiest meals she likes uses North Sea shrimps on good bread with egg. You can serve them on rye bread with just a little remoulade or butter, then put the shrimps on top and finish it with eggs.

Of course, in our house scrambled eggs are not simply scrambled eggs.

They have to be schlotzig.

We have standards.

How do I know a meal has been successful?

It is not because somebody says the correct words while sitting at the table.

It comes later.

Friends go home, then a WhatsApp message arrives saying it was a lovely day again. Perhaps they have gone home carrying a doggy bag, and the next evening they heat it up and send another message because the food is still good.

That makes me happy.

Cooking is work. Grünkohl especially is something you have to watch. You add things at different times. You don’t want the meat overcooked. You have to think about it.

I probably make it too rarely because it takes effort.

But I love doing it.

At the end of our conversation I was asked a difficult question.

Imagine I could keep only one recipe, food tradition or cooking habit from my life. What would survive?

My answer was not Grünkohl.

It was not barbecue.

It was not my special knife, garlic, Pinkel or crispy potatoes.

It was what my mother taught me at the stove.

The People You Can Count On.
Member Stories

The People You Can Count On.

What makes somebody worth having around? For Janita, it might be a boss who trusts you or a colleague who makes work enjoyable. For me, it is also about responsibility, friendship and knowing who will be there when something really matters.

By Fabrice, France.

Janita and I began our conversation with an imaginary visit to a café. I ordered sparkling water, while Janita chose a strawberry milkshake. From there, we started talking about the people who make ordinary places and activities better. Not necessarily the most important people, or the ones with the biggest titles, but those whose presence makes a workplace, club or association somewhere you enjoy being.

It sounds like a simple question. Everybody knows somebody who is good company, somebody who makes people laugh or somebody who can organise things when nobody else wants to take responsibility.

But as we talked, I noticed how differently Janita and I approached it. She remembered people who had made her working life more enjoyable. I thought more about what people actually do, whether you can depend on them, and what kind of relationship you have with them.

Perhaps that is because our working lives have been quite different.

Janita worked in a liquor store when she was young, and she remembers her boss as somebody who made a real difference. He was friendly, treated her well and taught her things she didn’t know. More importantly, he trusted her. Even though she was young, he gave her the keys to the shop.

That tells you something about their working relationship. A boss can give instructions all day, but handing somebody the keys means you believe they are capable of taking responsibility.

There was another side to the job that Janita remembers particularly well. On Saturdays, they could wear their rugby shirts to work, and there was a television for watching rugby or cricket. The sport depended on what was happening that weekend, but it became part of the atmosphere in the shop.

She experienced something similar at one of the pharmacies where she later worked. Her boss was also enthusiastic about sport, and they would sometimes watch rugby, cricket or the Olympics on a computer. Janita is still connected with that former boss on Facebook, where sport remains a regular subject.

I could understand why she remembered those jobs fondly. Her employers didn’t simply tell her what to do. They created an environment where people could work together and enjoy themselves.

Her experience in another pharmacy was very different. It belonged to a large chain, with procedures, targets, performance indicators and considerable pressure from management. The expectations applied to everybody, whether they worked at the till, stocked shelves or held a management position. There wasn’t much room for mistakes.

Janita was describing two kinds of workplace, and it wasn’t the professional activity that made the difference. It was the atmosphere created by the people running them.

For me, however, work has a different place in my life.

I go to work to earn money. I don’t go there to make friends.

That doesn’t mean I want to spend my working day arguing with everybody. Of course it’s better when people are competent and you can work together without unnecessary problems. But I don’t need somebody at work to make my life special. I have my friends outside work, and those relationships are something different.

For Janita, a good colleague or boss can become part of what makes the working day worthwhile. I understand that. I simply don’t expect my workplace to provide the same things as my friendships.

During the conversation, we considered whether somebody could be very good at their job but difficult to get along with.

I suggested myself.

I know I can speak loudly. I’m not always particularly polite, and I don’t necessarily wrap everything in diplomatic language. If something needs to be said, I tend to say it. People who know me might describe me as stubborn or grumpy, and I can understand why.

Janita remembered a colleague with a different kind of difficulty. When something didn’t go her way, this woman would become upset, sometimes cry or make a scene, and the attention would move away from the original problem towards her reaction.

That can be exhausting for everybody else, particularly when people are already working under pressure.

But being easy to get along with and being dependable are not exactly the same thing.

I might not always be the most cheerful person in the room. I might speak too loudly or say something too directly. But when somebody genuinely needs my help, that is another matter.

I might not always be the most cheerful person in the room. I might speak too loudly or say something too directly. But when somebody genuinely needs my help, that is another matter.

Of course, it depends on the person.

I don’t believe that being helpful means agreeing to every request or making yourself available to everybody whenever they want something. There are people who will ask and ask without considering what it costs somebody else. I have had situations where I eventually decided that enough was enough.

But for a good friend, I can do a great deal.

If somebody I care about calls me at midnight or three o’clock in the morning because they genuinely need help, I can get in the car and go. Even travelling more than a thousand kilometres to the south of France is not necessarily a problem.

That might seem strange coming from somebody who has just admitted that he isn’t always very polite.

But I don’t see a contradiction.

I can be difficult in a conversation and still be somebody you can rely on. I can enjoy somebody’s company without wanting to take responsibility for their problems. And I can have a close friendship with somebody I don’t speak to every week.

For me, friendship is not measured by how often we sit together drinking coffee. What happens when somebody really needs you matters as well.

When we moved from workplaces to clubs and associations, Janita and I found ourselves on more familiar ground.

I have been involved in organising activities, and I know how much work can be hidden behind an event that appears quite straightforward to everybody attending.

Before you invite people, you need to know what you are actually going to do. You need a programme, a suitable place, the right people and whatever equipment or arrangements the activity requires. Sometimes you need assistance from another association. Sometimes somebody who promised to help becomes unavailable, or a location cannot be used.

And that is when you discover whether your preparation was good enough.

I like having a Plan B. If something doesn’t work, you need another solution. You cannot simply stand there with twenty people waiting and announce that the evening is cancelled because one part of the arrangement has failed.

Janita knew something about this from her cycling days.

She belonged to a large cycling club in South Africa, with several hundred members divided into different groups according to their abilities. There were beginners, intermediate cyclists and faster riders, with people responsible for arranging the group activities.

The club also organised evening rides of approximately thirty to thirty-five kilometres. The problem for Janita was that she had to drive around thirty kilometres just to reach the meeting point, and then drive all the way home after finishing the ride.

She realised that several other cyclists lived near her and had the same inconvenience.

So she started a WhatsApp group, invited the local riders and began arranging their own evening rides. She organised the meeting points, times, routes, distances and speeds according to whoever wanted to participate.

They went out several times and enjoyed themselves.

I liked that example because she didn’t need to complain about the original club or insist that somebody else change the arrangements. She saw a practical problem and did something about it.

It was also interesting to hear how she thought about the people joining her rides. The speed and distance depended on the group. The arrangement had to work for the people who were actually coming, not simply for the person organising it.

In my associations, I also have to consider the participants, but I tend to approach the work through the programme and the preparations necessary to make it happen.

The two things belong together. Somebody has to take responsibility for organising an activity, but the activity must also be worth attending.

We also discussed what would be involved if Janita took on an official role in one of the associations I know. She was curious about the meetings, events and responsibilities, and I explained some of the administration involved in running a shooting club, including correspondence with the authorities and the obligations connected with its activities.

Being president is not simply a matter of attending meetings. There are rules, safety responsibilities and paperwork. Janita was familiar with organising people, but she was also surprised by some of the administrative requirements involved.

It was another example of how much responsibility can sit behind something that members experience mainly as a social activity.

We then considered an imaginary club member who never organises anything, never volunteers, regularly forgets meetings and generally contributes very little to the practical work of the association.

There was just one exception.

He always arrived with excellent cake and made everybody laugh.

Should we keep him?

Janita thought the answer was obvious. Of course we should. An association normally has a president, secretary, treasurer and other people responsible for running things. Not every member needs an official job. If somebody makes the gatherings more enjoyable, that is also a contribution.

I could understand her point, although somebody still has to do the work.

You cannot organise a successful event entirely with cake and jokes. If nobody arranges the place, prepares the programme, contacts the participants or takes responsibility for the necessary decisions, there won’t be much of an event to enjoy.

But if those things are already taken care of, why shouldn’t somebody come simply to spend time with the others?

It is one of the differences between running an organisation and belonging to one.

The people doing the administration may not be the people who make everybody laugh. The person who keeps the atmosphere pleasant may have no interest in joining the committee. And somebody who is excellent at organising might be a little difficult to deal with.

An association needs different kinds of people. The important thing is that the work gets done and people have a reason to come back.

Towards the end of our conversation, we returned to the imaginary café. We had our sparkling water and strawberry milkshake, and now there was one more chair at the table.

We were asked whom we would like to invite.

I chose my wife.

There were plenty of other possibilities, including people who might be entertaining or who had interesting experiences to share. But when I thought about somebody I would actually like to have sitting beside us, I didn’t need to search very far.

My wife was the obvious answer.

We talked about her patience. She is a very patient person, and that is something I appreciate. We have shared a great deal of life together, and she knows me with all my qualities and difficulties.

Janita chose Sarah, another member of Brida whom I haven’t met. She thought Sarah’s interest in traditional dancing, her languages and her sense of humour would make for an enjoyable conversation. She also thought Sarah and I might have things to learn from one another.

That would certainly be interesting. I enjoy meeting people who have different experiences and interests, and there is usually something to talk about once you begin.

But I was happy with my own choice.

We had spent the conversation discussing employers, colleagues, friends, club organisers and people who make gatherings more enjoyable. Janita had remembered bosses who trusted her and allowed people to enjoy themselves at work. We had both described the satisfaction and responsibility involved in organising activities. I had talked about being direct, sometimes difficult, and about how far I would go to help somebody who matters to me.

There are different ways of being important in another person’s life.

A good employer can make work more pleasant. A competent colleague can make a difficult job easier. An organiser can bring people together. Somebody with a good sense of humour can make an evening worth attending. And a good friend can be the person you call when you need help, even if you haven’t spoken for a long time.

I wouldn’t expect one person to fulfil all those roles.

Nor do I think somebody has to be endlessly cheerful or agreeable to be worth having around. People have different characters, different responsibilities and different ways of showing that they care.

As for the person I would choose to spend another afternoon with, there was no difficult decision.

I’d bring my wife.

The People Who Make Life a Little Better.
At The Table

The People Who Make Life a Little Better.

From birthday songs and Brazilian pizza to flying marquees and a jealous Mayor, the Lunch table discovers that sometimes the smallest gestures make the biggest difference.

By Nathalie, usually in Accra, but momentarily in France; Rosii in Sao Paulo; Monica in Adelaide; Fruitloop in South Africa; and the Mayor in Cleebourg.

It began with a birthday song. Not a particularly well-rehearsed birthday song, admittedly, but one sung with considerable enthusiasm and very little concern for musical accuracy.

Rosii had celebrated her birthday the previous week, but she had missed Lunch because of an appointment. The Mayor was determined that she would not escape the traditional embarrassment of having everyone sing to her.

Fruitloop counted down. One, two, three.

And off they went.

Somewhere between the different voices, questionable timing and the Mayor announcing that they really needed to practise, Rosii was treated to a birthday performance that probably would not have impressed a professional choir. It certainly impressed the birthday girl.

“Oh, so cute. Thanks so much for your care,” she said.

And there it was, before anyone had even introduced the day’s topic. A small example of what makes life better: people remembering you, making a fuss over you and singing badly because they care.

There was another reason for celebration. Nathalie was joining from France, enjoying a short visit home before returning to Ghana. She was delighted to be back in her own house, breathing the familiar air and enjoying the simple pleasures of French life. Even the chilly weather seemed a small price to pay.

The Mayor, who was relatively close by, regretted that there wasn’t enough time to meet for an apéritif. Perhaps in summer, they agreed.

For now, there was Lunch. And that was rather nice too.

Naturally, the birthday conversation soon turned to food.

Rosii had celebrated with her family over pizza, which led to a lively discussion about Brazilian eating habits and her own complicated relationship with this particular Italian invention.

There had been a time when Friday meant pizza. Every Friday. Unfortunately, Rosii explained, she is not the sort of person who eats one slice and politely stops.

Two slices? Possibly. Three? Quite likely.

Eventually, she decided that pizza every Friday was perhaps not the wisest arrangement. But birthdays are special occasions, and special occasions deserve pizza.

This reminded the Mayor of an Italian restaurant Rosii had recommended years earlier. The restaurant was run by Giovanni, whom Rosii remembered with enormous affection.

He wasn’t simply the owner who occasionally appeared to inspect the business. According to Rosii, he was always there, talking to customers, helping his staff and making people feel welcome. She particularly admired the way he remained personally involved.

And then there were the birthdays.

At Giovanni’s restaurant, a birthday celebration was apparently not something that could pass unnoticed. Waiters would arrive banging large saucepan lids together, while another carried a little cupcake with a candle.

The whole restaurant would know that somebody was celebrating.

Rosii described the place as comfortable and welcoming, with staff who had worked alongside Giovanni for years. It was the sort of restaurant where the owner himself helped create the atmosphere.

She promised that when the Mayor eventually visited Brazil, she would take him there.

He accepted immediately.

It was a lovely example of the day’s topic before the topic had properly begun. Giovanni made his restaurant special not simply through food, but through his presence. He remembered that people were there for more than dinner.

Sometimes they were there to celebrate being alive.

Fruitloop finally introduced the question: Who is the person in your circle who makes everything more enjoyable simply by arriving?

Rosii didn’t have to think for long.

Her sister-in-law was one of those people. Always cheerful, always funny, always able to make the family laugh. Her niece’s husband was another, someone Rosii described as positive and enjoyable to talk to.

But her sister-in-law held a particularly special place.

Whether someone was happy, sad or disappointed, Rosii explained, talking to her could make things feel better. She had a way of helping people relax and find their laughter again.

Nathalie’s answer carried a different kind of warmth.

She thought of her father, who had died. She remembered him as a positive, energetic and active person, someone whose enthusiasm seemed to spread naturally to those around him.

She remembered him as a positive, energetic and active person, someone whose enthusiasm seemed to spread naturally to those around him.

Being near a person like that, she explained, was almost contagious. Their energy became a kind of booster.

She also spoke about a woman she knew in her village who remained remarkably calm and positive, even when facing serious difficulties. Faith played an important role in this woman’s life, and Nathalie admired the quiet strength she seemed to draw from it.

When something went wrong in Nathalie’s own life, she sometimes thought about people like her.

There was something important in that observation. The people who make our lives better are not necessarily the loudest, funniest or most entertaining. Sometimes they are the ones whose example stays with us long after the conversation has ended.

Nathalie was careful not to suggest that everyone could behave that way easily. For some people, positivity seemed natural. Others had to work much harder at it.

Fruitloop wondered whether personality played a part. Perhaps introverts and extroverts simply brought different kinds of energy into a room.

The Mayor’s answer took an unexpected turn.

After reflecting on a demanding period of his life, he admitted that he sometimes found animals easier company than people. His cats, at least, offered affection without complicated expectations.

Although, as he quickly acknowledged, the affection wasn’t entirely unconditional.

The cats did expect food.

Fruitloop then asked a dangerous question.

What would happen to Lunch if she and the Mayor were no longer there?

Would the meetings become peaceful? Boring? Or would Rosii and Nathalie immediately take charge?

The Mayor appeared quite interested in the idea.

Nathalie thought she and Rosii would manage perfectly well. They would tell stories, laugh and help each other find the English words they needed.

Rosii agreed enthusiastically. Nathalie had so many interesting experiences from her travels, and Rosii was curious to hear more about her life and family.

They would learn from each other, she decided.

Nathalie suddenly became suspicious.

Was Fruitloop asking because she and the Mayor were planning to disappear the following week?

No, Fruitloop assured her. Nobody was abandoning anybody.

But the idea had taken hold. Rosii imagined the hosts becoming invisible, secretly watching while the two women conducted their own meeting.

The Mayor revealed that he had once used a similar technique in his teaching. He would write on the whiteboard that he was a ghost and that the students could no longer see him. They had to talk to one another without asking him for translations or vocabulary.

It was difficult at first, he explained, but eventually people found their way.

Fruitloop concluded that perhaps their work was done.

The Mayor thanked her for making them both unemployed.

It was a wonderfully ridiculous exchange, but there was a genuine possibility hiding inside it. Rosii and Nathalie weren’t frightened by the idea of speaking without their hosts. They could imagine themselves carrying the conversation, helping each other and enjoying the experience.

And if they couldn’t find a word?

Well, they would find another way.

The next question concerned what people bring to a gathering.

Food? Stories? Or absolute chaos?

Rosii chose stories. She liked bringing funny experiences or interesting subjects that encouraged people to exchange opinions. Nathalie also preferred stories, although she pointed out that food could make a gathering with friends more relaxed.

For a serious meeting, however, eating might become a distraction.

The Mayor’s contribution was settled when one of his cats made an appearance.

The cat apparently decided that Lunch required his personal supervision. The Mayor introduced him to the table, while trying to prevent the cat from presenting an unfortunate part of his anatomy to the camera.

Fruitloop had her answer.

The Mayor brought cats and chaos.

There was also some discussion about tea, particularly the Mayor’s preferred variety, which had run out. Apparently, not all tea in his household met the required standards.

The cat, meanwhile, seemed completely unconcerned.

Then Fruitloop asked whether the person who makes everyone laugh is always good for a group, or whether too much humour can become exhausting.

This produced one of the more thoughtful discussions of the day.

Nathalie believed that laughter was essential, but there had to be a balance. If everything became a joke, people might struggle to have serious conversations or deal with important matters.

Rosii agreed. The English word they eventually settled on was balance, although Rosii had already expressed the idea through another familiar word: equilibrium.

The Mayor added that a funny person could be wonderful at a boring dinner party, particularly if the food was dreadful. But someone who constantly dominated a gathering might become rather tiring.

So the table reached an agreement.

Laughter was good. Seriousness had its place. And knowing when to use each was part of making a gathering enjoyable.

Naturally, this sensible conclusion was immediately followed by a banana.

Fruitloop had prepared something special.

Imagine, she suggested, that a banana joined your friendship group.

Not an ordinary banana, of course. This banana told brilliant jokes, remembered everyone’s birthdays and gave excellent advice. In fact, it was so charming that it became more popular than everyone else.

Would you be jealous?

Or would you appoint the banana president?

Rosii initially struggled to find the English words for the scene forming in her imagination. She could picture the whole thing perfectly, but explaining her thoughts was another matter.

Eventually, she decided that if the banana gave good advice and made people laugh, it deserved the presidency.

Nathalie was equally generous, although she had reservations.

She would happily accept the banana as president, provided there was a more serious person working alongside it. Popularity was useful, but leadership required something more.

A banana, however charismatic, probably needed supervision.

Monica arrived during the banana debate, having been delayed by a difficult and exhausting situation involving responsibilities she was trying to leave behind.

She was delighted to see everyone’s smiling faces.

Monica explained that Lunch was often one of the highlights of her week. Fruitloop’s unusual questions and the pleasure of seeing everyone helped lift her spirits.

She also spoke warmly about the people at her Lions Club in Australia. Their shared commitment to helping the community meant a great deal to her.

The previous week, they had been working at an event in pouring rain when a large marquee threatened to blow away. Monica found herself holding it down for dear life.

Fortunately, she joked, she wasn’t skinny enough to be carried away with it.

A few hours later, she could laugh about the experience. The people around her made even difficult moments enjoyable.

Then she was brought up to speed on the banana election.

Monica examined the candidate’s qualifications with admirable practicality. Bananas contained potassium, were good for you and had a pleasant yellow colour, which happened to be one of her favourites.

She was perfectly happy to let the banana become president.

Especially because she had no desire to take on any more responsibility herself.

The Mayor, however, was less enthusiastic.

He announced that he would be insanely jealous of the banana. He would allow it to become president, naturally, but would immediately begin plotting its downfall.

A conveniently placed banana skin might do the trick.

Monica had been expecting something of the sort.

The Mayor considered the situation.

A banana with a personality. A Mayor with an attitude.

It was hardly a promising political partnership.

Monica’s arrival had brought the conversation back to its original question in a rather lovely way.

She had joined Lunch after a difficult night, with problems still demanding her attention. Yet she had made the effort to be there because the people at the table cheered her up.

Her stories about the Lions Club showed something similar. The pleasure wasn’t only in the work they were doing, important though that was. It was also in the companionship, the shared purpose and the ability to laugh together when the weather tried to destroy the marquee.

Rosii had described the same quality in her sister-in-law. Nathalie had recognised it in her father and the woman from her village. Giovanni had created it in his restaurant.

Different people, different circumstances, but something familiar connected them.

They made being together feel better.

And sometimes, simply arriving was enough.

There was still one final Fruitloop question to survive.

Would you rather have a best friend who turned into a pineapple every time they laughed, or one who exploded into confetti whenever they sneezed?

The Mayor immediately raised a practical objection.

Who was going to clean up afterwards?

Fruitloop had experience in this department. One Christmas, her family had used party poppers that showered confetti everywhere. It stuck to the walls, the ceiling, their clothes and practically every surface in the house.

It took weeks to get rid of it.

Monica wanted to know whether the pineapple friend would eventually return to human form. The Mayor suggested that perhaps the pineapple could be eaten, which led to a brief discussion about cannibalism and the controversial practice of putting pineapple on pizza.

The conversation had now travelled from birthday pizza to the possibility of eating one’s best friend.

Lunch was progressing beautifully.

Rosii chose the pineapple. Nathalie agreed, partly because of its connection to The Pineapple and partly because she had no intention of cleaning confetti off her walls.

Monica also favoured the pineapple. To her, it suggested summer, beaches and happy tropical memories.

Fruitloop had an additional reason for avoiding the confetti option.

Her husband sometimes sneezed three or four times in succession, and not necessarily in the same room. If every sneeze produced an explosion of confetti, she would spend her life cleaning up after him.

The Mayor imagined him wandering through the house, leaving a colourful trail behind.

At least, Fruitloop observed, she would always know where to find him.

Just follow the confetti.

By the end of the meeting, the pineapple had won the popular vote, the banana had been elected president, and the Mayor had narrowly avoided being replaced by a piece of fruit.

Rosii was still laughing.

There was no great mystery about the atmosphere at the table that day. It had been created by the people themselves: a birthday song, an invitation to Brazil, memories of loved ones, a cat appearing at exactly the right moment, Monica joining despite her difficult morning, and two women discovering that they could probably host Lunch perfectly well on their own.

As everyone began saying goodbye in several languages, Rosii offered perhaps the simplest review of the afternoon.

“I loved our meeting.”

And that seemed quite enough.

After all, the people who make life better don’t always arrive with grand gestures or extraordinary wisdom.

Sometimes they bring stories. Sometimes they bring laughter. Sometimes they bring a cat.

And occasionally, if Fruitloop has anything to do with it, they bring a banana with presidential ambitions.

Visual pauseThe Pineapple
Editorial photograph
Five Minutes Between Two Worlds.
At The Table

Five Minutes Between Two Worlds.

Manfred begins his working day sitting on a staircase. Martin ends his by preparing a remarkably efficient escape. We took five minutes from each of them, slowed the clock, and discovered that the smallest routines can contain an extraordinary amount of life.

By Manfred and Martin, both Germany.

Manfred sits on a staircase at home with a cup of coffee, a cigarette and his mobile phone. The home office is only a few metres away, and there is a perfectly comfortable chair inside. But he doesn’t want the chair. He wants the staircase.

Martin, meanwhile, is preparing to leave work. His coffee cup has to be returned, his belongings gathered, his jacket collected, and his computer kept alive until the very last possible moment. Then, suddenly, he disappears.

They work together, know each other’s habits and have developed the sort of friendship in which a little teasing is perfectly normal. Yet when we asked them to choose the best five minutes of their working day, neither could be entirely sure what the other would say.

Manfred chose the first five minutes. Martin chose the last.

There was something beautifully symmetrical about that. One man wanted to delay the beginning of work. The other wanted to accelerate its ending.

We decided to investigate both moments minute by minute, with something of Marcel Proust’s attention to the apparently insignificant. Five minutes would be examined so closely that we might discover things their owners had never noticed.

We certainly did.

Manfred’s morning begins with an open balcony door. He lets some fresh air into the corridor, starts his computer and then deliberately leaves the office again.

He sits on the bottom step of a staircase, drinks his coffee, smokes and looks at his phone.

From the outside, it is an unremarkable scene. A man sitting on a step when he could be sitting in a comfortable office chair. In winter as in summer. No cushion, no special arrangement, no attempt to make the experience luxurious.

But the location is not accidental.

Manfred explains that he needs a physical separation between his private time and his working time. The office is where work happens. The staircase is still outside that world. Even though he has already switched on the computer, he has not yet mentally begun the working day.

Five metres make all the difference.

He has chosen an uncomfortable seat because it is in precisely the right place. Moving those five metres would change the meaning of what he is doing.

And there is another important detail. He prefers to be alone. It is his time, without conversation or somebody arriving with a question.

What appears to be a coffee break is actually a small, carefully maintained boundary.

Unfortunately, that boundary has recently acquired a clock.

Since Monday, Manfred says, his company has introduced electronic time recording, accurate to the minute. Previously, he recorded his normal working hours without worrying whether he had started the computer a few minutes before or after eight. Now those minutes matter.

When we asked what happened during the first thirty seconds of his precious five minutes, his answer was rather unexpected. He might look at the clock and realise that only five minutes remained before work began.

The very knowledge that his peaceful moment was limited could turn it into stress.

He has already adjusted his behaviour to the new system. If every minute is counted, he intends to count them too, including the time he begins working earlier than usual.

The staircase has not moved. The coffee tastes the same. But the clock has changed the experience.

Manfred’s telephone follows a familiar morning route through several websites. For years, he says, news about wars and international politics occupied much of his attention. Lately, that has changed.

Electric cars have become a stronger interest. He now spends more time reading about them, while international news sometimes receives only a glance at the headlines.

It is not simply a matter of replacing unpleasant information with something cheerful. Manfred has become increasingly conscious of the enormous amount of information available every day and of the need to choose what deserves his attention.

He no longer watches political television discussion programmes. He finds it frustrating to listen to people arguing when he has strong opinions of his own but cannot join the discussion.

He wants information, but he also wants some control over how much of it enters his morning.

There is a curious contrast here. Manfred protects his first five minutes from other people, yet uses those same minutes to invite the entire world onto a small screen.

He is selective about which parts of that world receive an invitation.

And sometimes the most interesting thing is not on the screen at all.

A house is being built nearby. From his position beside the balcony door, Manfred can see vehicles arriving at the construction site, occasionally including large lorries attempting to reverse into a narrow entrance.

From his position beside the balcony door, Manfred can see vehicles arriving at the construction site, occasionally including large lorries attempting to reverse into a narrow entrance.

When that happens, the phone loses its importance.

He stands up and watches.

He is fascinated by how the drivers manoeuvre their vehicles. Sometimes he admires their skill; sometimes he thinks he might have approached the problem differently. The Mayor compared him to a football coach watching from the sidelines, convinced that he could improve the performance.

Manfred laughed, but there was also genuine curiosity in his answer. He wants to understand how the driver manages the manoeuvre, particularly when a trailer makes the task difficult.

An interruption, then, does not necessarily spoil his five minutes. It depends on whether he finds it interesting.

As Manfred puts it, the decision about whether something disturbs him is his own.

That is quite a strong claim for a man sitting on a staircase.

The more we examined Manfred’s morning, the clearer it became that this was not really a working-day habit at all.

He does it at weekends too.

On Saturdays and Sundays, he sits on the same staircase, drinks his coffee and checks his familiar websites. The difference is that he does not have to leave for work at a fixed time.

On holiday, the ritual travels with him.

At the caravan, he finds somewhere to sit outside with his coffee, cigarette and phone. In a hotel, he might go onto a balcony or outside the entrance. Even when he has an early appointment, he gets up earlier to preserve the moment.

It is not necessarily five minutes. It may be longer, depending on what comes next. But the basic ingredients remain.

There is a small complication when travelling. Manfred prefers weaker coffee than his wife, and the caravan has only one coffee maker, unlike their home, where they can prepare their drinks separately. Getting the strength right for both of them involves more negotiation with the coffee than one might expect.

Manfred considered whether he should finally write down the correct quantities. Even then, the stronger coffee would not necessarily suit him.

A small domestic engineering problem, still waiting for a satisfactory solution.

But the important discovery was that the ritual survives changes of place, season and schedule. The staircase is ideal, but not indispensable. The quiet beginning is what matters.

When asked whether ten minutes would be better than five, Manfred saw no great mystery. He would simply need more coffee, more cigarettes and have more time on the internet.

He was not trying to create a special experience. He was describing how he begins every day.

Only towards the end of our examination did he wonder whether the routine might actually prepare him for the day ahead.

He had never really considered it in those terms before.

Martin’s five minutes are entirely different.

He wants the end of the working day, preferably with a little flexibility about exactly when they occur. He admits that he is sometimes running late, which may explain why the final minutes have such appeal.

The first sensation is anticipation, accompanied by a certain amount of haste.

He begins gathering his belongings. The coffee cup goes back to the kitchen and may even get washed. He checks the things on his desk, decides what must come with him, and collects his jacket. The car is only a few metres away.

As he describes this sequence, the scene becomes increasingly recognisable.

Martin is not merely getting ready to leave. He is gradually dismantling the working day around himself.

There is one rule that he follows with surprising consistency.

He never changes the date on his desk calendar before the day has actually ended. If it is still the fourth of November, then the calendar remains on the fourth, however unpleasant the day may have been.

The Mayor suggested that changing the calendar early could be a wonderfully symbolic way of disposing of a bad day.

Martin acknowledged the attraction of the idea, but he was not convinced.

Tomorrow is tomorrow. Today has not finished yet.

This small refusal to advance the calendar sits rather amusingly beside his growing eagerness to leave the office.

His next ritual is even more revealing.

Martin prepares everything for departure but leaves his computer running until the last moment, just in case something unexpected still requires his attention.

Only when everything else is ready does he finally shut it down.

And then, according to Manfred, something extraordinary happens.

Martin disappears at remarkable speed.

Manfred knows the warning signs. The coffee cup is being put away. The belongings are moving. A previously calm colleague develops a sudden burst of activity.

Once the computer has been shut down, there is almost no time left to react.

The Mayor suggested that Martin must be passing straight through the wall rather than bothering with the door.

Martin improved the description. He simply diffuses through the window towards his car.

This is the Swimming Club in familiar form: a perfectly ordinary workplace behaviour subjected to the sort of analysis normally reserved for a complicated scientific phenomenon.

But beneath the comedy, Martin was discovering something about his own behaviour.

As Martin prepares to leave, his mind is already moving into the evening. He thinks about where he needs to go, what must be done first, and how the next few hours might unfold.

Sometimes he talks these plans through aloud, particularly when he is alone in the office.

He also recognises a recurring difficulty.

Even when he has enough time, he has a remarkable ability to fill it with one last task.

He knows he should leave. He may have somewhere important to be. Yet he suddenly thinks of something that could surely be completed before going home.

Then another possibility occurs.

Soon the comfortable margin of time has disappeared, and he finds himself rushing again.

Martin does not blame his colleagues for this. He says he is perfectly capable of ruining his own five minutes without assistance.

There was considerable humour in his description, but also a recognisable frustration. He knows what he should do. He has known for years. Yet knowing does not prevent him from repeating the same mistake.

By the fourth minute, in his imagined sequence, he hopes to be sitting in the car.

Then comes another important moment.

The music begins.

For Martin, switching on the car radio helps announce that the working day has ended. Sometimes he listens to ordinary radio, sometimes to CDs, depending on his mood.

His relationship with the car’s sound system is not entirely straightforward. He once replaced a faulty CD player with a newer unit that looked almost identical to the original. He was disappointed to discover that the old cassette mechanism had disappeared.

The remarkable thing was that he had never actually used the cassette player. He simply liked knowing that it was there.

He was quite indignant about losing a function that had apparently been of no practical importance to him.

And in his Alfa Romeo, music can mean something altogether different. Open the window a little, he says, and listen to the engine.

That is music too.

Manfred’s own preference provides a contrast. He is much more interested in information radio than recorded music. His car is another place where he wants to know what is happening in the world.

Two colleagues, two radios, two ways of making the journey their own.

The most interesting discovery came almost by accident.

As Martin described how easily his final minutes could be interrupted, Manfred suddenly recognised himself as a possible culprit.

When they leave the office together, Manfred sometimes remembers a subject they discussed earlier in the day. Just as Martin is preparing to escape, Manfred feels that the subject deserves another few minutes of attention.

From Manfred’s perspective, it is a perfectly reasonable opportunity to continue a conversation.

From Martin’s perspective, those minutes may already belong to the beginning of his free time.

There was no accusation. Martin was quite relaxed about the possibility of chatting after work and distinguished a friendly conversation from another piece of unfinished business.

Nevertheless, the contrast was difficult to miss.

Manfred had spent much of our conversation explaining why he needed his own undisturbed morning ritual. He carefully protected those first minutes before work began.

Yet here he was, potentially entering Martin’s equally important final minutes with another subject to discuss.

The Mayor pointed out the contradiction.

Manfred immediately recognised it.

If he expected other people to respect the boundary around his morning, he ought to allow them a similar boundary at the end of their day.

He said he would have to think about that.

It was a small moment, and perhaps a more significant one than either man had expected. No grand disagreement had been necessary. They had simply described their familiar routines closely enough to see how those routines sometimes met.

Martin’s final five minutes were not necessarily ruined by a conversation. Manfred’s first five minutes were not necessarily ruined by the sight of a lorry reversing into a driveway.

But both men wanted some say in what happened to their time.

The distinction was not between interruption and silence. It was between what they had chosen and what arrived without their choosing.

By the time we finished, our five-minute investigation had lasted considerably longer than five minutes.

Martin thought the exercise was interesting because so many little actions had become automatic. Breaking the routine into individual minutes revealed details he would probably never have considered otherwise.

Manfred had reached a similar observation from a different direction. He was struck by how important his morning ritual had become, how consistently he repeated it, and how little he had previously thought about its significance.

He wondered whether familiar routines might provide a sense of security or normality. He was not entirely sure.

That uncertainty was worth preserving.

The conversation had not turned Manfred into a philosopher of morning coffee or Martin into an authority on leaving work. Both remained wonderfully practical.

Manfred would still sit on his staircase tomorrow, regardless of whether the experience contained a deeper meaning. Martin would probably still carry his cup to the kitchen, glance at his calendar, keep the computer running until the final moment and then make a remarkably swift departure.

And there was something else we had discovered.

Their five minutes were not really about coffee, cigarettes, computers, calendars or car radios. Those were the visible details. What mattered was the delicate transition between one part of life and another.

For Manfred, the working day must not begin too early, even if the office is only five metres away.

For Martin, the working day must eventually finish, preferably without another task appearing just as he is ready to leave.

One man sits on a staircase. The other vanishes through a window.

And somewhere between them, the working day begins and ends.

AI Is for Everyone. But It Is Still Only an Assistant.
Essay

AI Is for Everyone. But It Is Still Only an Assistant.

An AI engineer from Azerbaijan, a retired academic in London and a conversation host in France begin with song lyrics and emotion. They end up somewhere more important: asking what AI can do for us, and what we still have to do for ourselves.

By Bruce Lloyd, London, with Frank Peters, Cleebourg and guest, Abbas Rzayev, Ganja, Azerbaijan.

There was a certain irony in the timing.

Frank had just asked Abbas Rzayev whether artificial intelligence and technology might make national boundaries less important. Abbas was sitting in Azerbaijan, Frank was in France and I was in London. We were speaking about a technology that increasingly allows people to work together regardless of where they happen to live.

Then Abbas disappeared.

The screen went dark.

“Welcome to modern technology,” Frank said.

A few minutes later Abbas returned. There had been a power cut. His laptop battery was still working, so we continued.

It was a small interruption, but it somehow captured the whole conversation. Here we were discussing extraordinary technology, available across borders and increasingly accessible to ordinary people, while depending on something as basic as electricity to keep the conversation going.

Abbas had recently completed his degree in Latvia and was back with his family in Azerbaijan. His bachelor’s research had explored something that, at first, sounds rather strange: could artificial intelligence identify the emotional character of a song simply by analysing its lyrics?

Not the singer’s voice, the melody, the instruments, rhythm or harmony. Just the words.

That question soon took us somewhere much larger. If AI can recognise something as human as emotion, what exactly is it recognising? And what should we humans do with that ability?

Abbas was careful about what his research had and had not done. His system had worked with the lyrics of more than 2,000 songs and tried to classify them according to broad emotional categories. It had not listened to the music.

That distinction matters because the words and the music can be telling us different things. A song may sound cheerful while its lyrics are sad. Someone listening in a language they do not understand may experience the music as positive without realising that the words describe something painful.

Abbas also understood the limitations. Music contains far more than language, and analysing the complete musical experience would be another project altogether.

Even lyrics alone create difficult problems. Songs contain metaphor, ambiguity, irony and context. A phrase that looks negative in isolation may mean something quite different inside the whole song.

What interested me was Abbas’s response when the system got something wrong. If it classified a song as sad when the researcher expected it to be happy, he did not simply dismiss the result. The mistake became part of the investigation. Why had the system reached that conclusion? What had it noticed? What had it misunderstood? Could better examples or better instructions help?

That, for Abbas, is where prompt engineering becomes important. You do not simply give the machine something and accept whatever comes back. You tell it what you are trying to achieve, examine the response, discover where it fails and refine the instructions.

You tell it what you are trying to achieve, examine the response, discover where it fails and refine the instructions.

It immediately connected with something I have found in my own experiments with AI. I often deliberately ask questions where I do not know the answer, and sometimes I put the same question to several AI systems. They frequently agree on some things, disagree on others and occasionally produce an idea I had not considered.

The disagreement is useful. So is the surprise.

Neither means the machine has delivered the final word.

I have been exploring a related question with poetry.

Suppose a poem creates a genuine emotional reaction in you. Does it matter whether it was written by Wordsworth or generated by artificial intelligence?

The emotion, after all, happens in the reader.

That does not settle the question. It makes it more interesting.

AI can already imitate established forms and styles surprisingly well. Ask it for a Shakespearean sonnet and it can produce something recognisably sonnet-like. It can absorb many of the visible characteristics of a particular way of writing.

It can certainly write better poetry than I can.

But that is not the most demanding test. Could it equal a genuinely original poet working at the edge of the form and creating something that had not existed before?

Abbas made a distinction during the conversation that stayed with me.

“If you want something ready,” he said, AI can be very good.

But if you want to create something new, he sees its role differently.

“AI tools only is your assistant.”

The grammar may not have been textbook English, but the thought was perfectly clear.

AI can search, compare, summarise, classify and suggest. It can reduce routine work and help us reach a useful starting point much faster. Abbas does not see that as the same thing as replacing the person doing the work, and that seems significant coming from somebody whose own field is artificial intelligence.

The temptation is to concentrate on the answer AI produces. Abbas’s work suggested that much of the value may lie in what happens afterwards: questioning the result, investigating mistakes and understanding why one approach works better than another.

In that sense, the technology may be new, but the discipline required to use it well is not.

For much of my working life, getting to a useful starting point could require weeks or months of reading, searching and organising information. If I wanted to explore how values have changed over the past fifty years, for example, I might spend months building a framework before I was ready to have the interesting discussion.

A carefully constructed question to AI might now help build that framework in minutes.

That does not make the answer correct.

It means the serious conversation can begin sooner.

Increasingly, the scarce resource may not be information. It may be judgement.

There was another aspect of Abbas’s work that interested me. He deliberately wanted his system to be accessible.

He had not built it around equipment available only to a wealthy company or a major research institution. He ran it on his own computer. Someone with an ordinary, reasonably capable machine, he explained, could download the project, follow the instructions and experiment with another dataset.

His principle was simple:

“AI is for everyone.”

Research, in his view, should not remain locked inside academia if ordinary people can make practical use of it.

There is an interesting tension in that idea. AI represents a remarkable widening of access to knowledge and computing power, yet institutions, commercial interests, rules and established structures still influence what can be developed and how it is used.

Frank and I regularly return to the question of vested interests. Technology may move quickly. Human institutions rarely do.

Perhaps that was one reason the conversation across generations worked so well. Abbas is at the beginning of his professional life. I am retired. We approached AI from very different places, yet neither of us seemed especially interested in defending the way things have always been done simply because they have always been done that way.

I suggested that younger and older people may sometimes have something unexpected in common. For different reasons, both can be freer of some of the vested interests that dominate the middle of professional life.

Abbas was not arguing for throwing tradition away. In fact, he spoke warmly about things he believes should be preserved.

“Sometimes I also support the traditional ways,” he said. “But it doesn’t mean that we should always just stay in the traditional way.”

Preserving something valuable is not the same as refusing change.

Eventually Frank asked the practical question.

Abbas had analysed thousands of songs. The academic purpose could be explained. But what do we actually do with the result?

Abbas suggested recommendation systems that might choose music according to the mood somebody wants to create or change. He also wondered about possible future applications involving psychology and therapy, although he was careful not to pretend that his present research had already reached that point.

I mentioned examples I had heard about where background music was used to influence behaviour in public spaces or shops, and that led us towards the less comfortable side of the subject.

If music can affect behaviour, and AI becomes increasingly sophisticated at analysing the relationship between music, emotion and human response, then the same capability can potentially be used in very different ways.

“For better or for worse,” as I put it.

That qualification matters because the technology does not decide its own purpose. People do.

Frank phrased it another way. AI can give us suggestions and ideas, but eventually somebody has to take those ideas out into the real world and decide what to do with them.

That is the part we cannot outsource quite so easily.

Near the end, Frank tried to pull the threads together. AI, he said, is a tool. It is up to us to use it properly and effectively.

After more than an hour discussing emotions, poetry, music, prompts, research, generations and the future of knowledge, that may sound almost too simple.

Perhaps simplicity is useful.

We do not know where artificial intelligence will be in two years. We are not even particularly confident about where it will be in six months. Its capabilities are changing quickly.

Our responsibility changes rather less quickly.

We still have to ask the questions, decide which answers deserve attention, notice the mistakes and judge what should be preserved and what should change. Above all, somebody still has to do something with the result.

Our conversation ended, appropriately enough, with the Eurovision Song Contest.

I had previously asked AI to analyse what might make a Eurovision entry successful. Frank suggested Abbas could analyse the songs while I supplied the recipe for success.

I proposed the opposite. I would produce the analysis and Abbas could create the winning song.

Then football entered the conversation, as football eventually does.

Frank mentioned an earlier AI prediction about Spain winning a major tournament.

Abbas was unimpressed.

He had already expected Spain to win.

“There is no needed AI to ask,” he said.

After more than an hour discussing what artificial intelligence might be capable of doing, it was a wonderfully human place to finish.

Sometimes the machine can help us ask a better question. Sometimes it can give us a remarkable starting point.

And sometimes we already know enough to make up our own minds.

A Little More Light for Winter.
Member Stories

A Little More Light for Winter.

From handmade lanterns and fairy lights to familiar Christmas films, the colder months bring plenty of reasons to make home a little more cheerful.

By Babette, Germany.

It is getting cold in Germany. Today, the temperature outside is somewhere between two and five degrees, and I am already looking forward to getting home, sitting on the sofa with my knitting and having a hot chocolate with marshmallows.

But first, I need to collect my son from school.

This is the time of year when I enjoy making the house cosy. I like having small lights in the windows, and soon it will be time to put up the Christmas decorations. We have already started with the lanterns for St Martin’s Day, and I have another project planned for the garden.

If everything goes well, we will have a new Christmas tree made from wood and covered in lights.

We just have to build it first.

Yesterday, we went to a lantern procession. The children had made their lanterns at school, and I showed Janita what they looked like.

In Germany, St Martin’s Day is celebrated on 11 November, and lantern processions are part of the tradition. This was the last one at school for us, so I do not think we will be walking in another procession this year.

Instead, I have put the lantern in the window. In the evening, I switch on the light inside it, and it looks lovely.

After St Martin’s Day, I will change the decorations for Christmas. But that does not mean the house is without lights during the rest of the year.

I like fairy lights much more than the normal ceiling lights. They make everything feel warmer and more comfortable, especially when it is dark outside.

In September, I bought two hearts with lights inside them, and now they shine every evening. I also have a curtain with many small lights that stays up throughout the year.

Even in the morning, when I drink my coffee, I like having a little light shining in the window behind me.

It is a small thing, but I enjoy it.

At the end of November, probably around the 27th or 28th, I will start decorating for Christmas.

We have two floors in our house, but most of the decorations go on the main floor. We also decorate outside.

Last year, we built a large wooden star with lots of lights and put it in the garden. This year, I would like to add a Christmas tree made from wood.

I found an idea in a brochure from a DIY shop. It looked interesting, and I thought we could make something similar ourselves. I also looked on Pinterest, because there are always so many ideas there.

The tree needs pieces of wood that we can put together with screws. Then we have to paint it and add the lights.

I do not want to buy a finished one from Amazon. I would rather build it ourselves.

Of course, finding a picture of something and actually making it are two different things.

Janita looked at my idea and thought it might be a little complicated. She told me about a wooden Christmas tree her mother uses in South Africa. It is tall, made with wooden posts and supports, and can be decorated with fairy lights or tinsel.

It is tall, made with wooden posts and supports, and can be decorated with fairy lights or tinsel.

She sent me a picture so I could compare the two designs.

Her mother’s tree looks a little easier to build, although I still like my original idea. We have a spray gun that could make painting the wood easier, and I need to check what materials we can use.

I will ask my husband which design he thinks is better and easier to make.

Perhaps we can start this weekend, or maybe next weekend. We still have a few weeks before the Christmas decorations go up.

I hope the finished tree will look like the picture. When it is ready, I will send Janita a photograph.

Talking about Christmas decorations led us to another tradition: watching Christmas films.

We have an artificial Christmas tree that we take out of its cardboard box every year, put together and decorate with lights and Christmas baubles. Some of our decorations have the Grinch on them.

My son, especially likes the Grinch. He has Grinch clothes, including a tracksuit and socks, and even Grinch bed linen.

My daughter also likes the Grinch, and she watches the film every year. But another film is particularly special in our family.

It is Three Wishes for Cinderella, known in German as Drei Haselnüsse für Aschenbrödel.

The film was made in 1973, as a production involving the former Czechoslovakia and East Germany. It is an old fairy tale, but it is still shown on German television every Christmas season.

She loves watching it, and it was one of my favourites too. I introduced her to the film, and now it is something we both enjoy.

This year, there are many opportunities to watch it on television, beginning in November and continuing into January.

Janita was surprised when I told her how old the film was. She wondered how she had discovered a film made so many years before she was born.

The answer was quite simple. I had shown it to her.

There is also a newer version, but we have not watched that one yet. Perhaps we will try it this Christmas.

I also like another old fairy-tale film, Father Frost. I believe it is Russian, and it reminds me of the Russian language I learned at school.

I can still read and write Cyrillic letters, and I remember some words, although I have forgotten much of the spoken language because I do not use it anymore.

It is funny how an old film can bring back something you learned many years ago.

Janita and I started exchanging other Christmas film ideas.

In her family, they enjoy watching A Boy Called Christmas. She sent me a picture of it, and I said we should look for it.

She also mentioned Red One, a film about Santa Claus being kidnapped.

In our family, we watch the three The Santa Clause films every year. We also talked about Home Alone, the Grinch and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

That reminded me of something I had seen in a shop brochure the previous week: Willy Wonka chocolate.

I thought it would be fun to try it. After collecting my son from school, I planned to look for it and see whether there was any left.

We also talked about a programme my daughter had watched on Netflix, Wonka’s Golden Ticket. It is a competition programme based on Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory, with contestants completing challenges to win a large prize.

I thought it was rather crazy.

Janita found it interesting, and soon we were discussing even more films. By the end, we had given each other quite a few things to watch over Christmas.

Before Christmas comes another celebration, although this year’s Halloween was not quite as busy as I had expected.

Last year, I had a large basket of sweets, and when we came home, it was empty.

This year, I prepared a smaller bowl, and there were still sweets left the next day.

We also had a little Halloween gathering, with mulled wine for the adults and a non-alcoholic warm punch for the children.

For the children’s drink, I used a Finnish non-alcoholic mulled wine, apple and cherry juice, and tea with vanilla.

I had prepared quite a lot, but we did not need all of it.

The weather was not particularly inviting. It was around ten degrees, with a cold wind, and the village seemed much quieter than last year.

My son went out on my electric bicycle, riding through the village, but many families did not have sweets. Some offered fruit instead, including small oranges.

It was a different Halloween from the previous year, but we still had our little celebration.

And now the next traditions are waiting.

There is still plenty to do before Christmas.

I need to buy the materials for the wooden tree, decide which design we will use and work out when we can build it. Later in November, I will take out the Christmas decorations and put up the lights.

There are also Christmas films to find. Perhaps we will watch the newer Cinderella film this year, or try one of Janita’s recommendations. And I still want to see whether I can find that Willy Wonka chocolate.

But today, after collecting my son from school, I have a much simpler plan.

I want to sit on the sofa, do some knitting and enjoy a hot chocolate with marshmallows.

Outside, it is cold. Inside, there are already little lights shining in the windows.

And for now, that is enough.

Recipe

Ralf’s Grünkohl mit Pinkel

A northern German winter meal of slow-cooked kale, smoked meats, Pinkel sausage and potatoes — and, according to Ralf, a dish that becomes even better the next day.

Ralf’s Grünkohl mit Pinkel

For the kale:

  • Kale, enough for a large pot
  • Onions, chopped
  • A rich cooking fat for frying the onions — Ralf uses goose fat and also mentions Wagyu fat
  • A little Hafergrütze (oat groats)
  • Mustard, a small spoonful or two, to taste
  • 2 small cloves garlic
  • Kassler, such as smoked pork loin or chops
  • Smoked bacon
  • Smoked sausage
  • Bremer Pinkel
  • Oldenburger Pinkel
  • A little of the Pinkel cooking liquid
  • Salt and other seasoning as required

For the potatoes:

  • Small waxy potatoes such as Drillinge
  • Butter

Optional extra, when the butcher tempts you:

  • Kassler spare ribs

To serve:

  • Beer
  • A small herbal digestif afterwards, if desired

Cook the small potatoes for roughly 10–15 minutes until just tender. Set them aside. They will later be browned in butter until crisp.

In a large pot, gently cook the chopped onions in the fat until aromatic and softened.

Add the kale, a little oat groats, the mustard and two small cloves of garlic.

Let everything cook slowly. Ralf allows roughly two hours for the kale.

After about an hour, add the Kassler, smoked bacon and smoked sausage to the kale so they can cook gently without becoming overdone.

If using Kassler spare ribs, they can join the meal as an extra.

Do not cook the Pinkel directly in the kale.

Place the Bremer and Oldenburger Pinkel in hot water and let them simmer gently. A considerable amount of fat will come out of the sausages.

When they are ready, take a little of this cooking liquid — Ralf uses a couple of spoonfuls — and stir it into the kale for extra flavour.

Put the cooked small potatoes into a frying pan with butter and cook until golden, crisp and crunchy.

Serve them alongside the kale, meats and Pinkel.

Do not worry if you have made too much. That is almost the point.

Refrigerate the leftovers safely and reheat them thoroughly the next day. I say the kale becomes better each time it is warmed.

For a later serving, take leftover cooked potatoes and fry them until crisp. Add cold kale and small pieces of the remaining meat to the same pan and heat everything together thoroughly.

For me, the third or fourth serving may be the best one of all.

And if you are invited to his house for Grünkohl mit Pinkel, there is one more rule.

Come hungry.

Fruitloop University Has Got Talent. Eventually.
Peeling Potatoes

Fruitloop University Has Got Talent. Eventually.

Five contestants, one Golden Pineapple, and a very simple question that became increasingly difficult: when is late actually too late?

By The Mayor & Fruitloop, actually, Fruitloop & The Mayor, with a supporting cast of weird and wonderful creatures.

By the time we officially started Peeling Potatoes, we were already 28 minutes late.

This was slightly inconvenient, considering the question for the morning was: How late is too late?

We had been dealing with all the things that apparently had to happen before the important thing could happen. When we eventually declared ourselves live, the Mayor pointed out that we were already overdrawn on time.

I decided not to let this small administrative failure interfere with the academic standards of Fruitloop University. I am, after all, the President. The Mayor disputes the extent of my authority occasionally, but that is mostly because he is the Vice President.

So I announced that Fruitloop University would be hosting its first talent show.

Fruitloop University’s Got Talent.

Five contestants. Five unusual talents. One Golden Pineapple Trophy.

There was only one problem.

Every contestant had a slightly different understanding of what it meant to be on time.

First came Sparkles, our unicorn singer. Sparkles could sing, but obviously she could not simply walk onto a stage and sing. She required a rainbow entrance. This was part of her artistic preparation, which sounded reasonable to me, except that rainbow entrances apparently take time.

I asked the Mayor whether creative people should be allowed a little more flexibility.

There was a long silence.

This usually means I have asked one of my Fruitloop questions and he is trying to find the trap.

Eventually he decided that Sparkles had a perfectly valid interest in showing us all her magic, beauty and artistic creativity. If she needed six hours, then from her point of view, six hours might be entirely reasonable. Unfortunately, the judges, the audience and the rest of civilisation also had vested interests.

Therefore, we needed rules.

Sparkles could be as magical as she liked, but she had to be magical within the allocated time.

Then I made it more difficult. What if she arrived late for the final but gave the best performance of the evening?

Now it depended on why she was late. If something beyond her control had happened, perhaps we could make an exception. If she was late because her performance still wasn’t perfect, then no. She knew the rules. Everybody else had followed them. Being brilliant did not give her permission to keep the rest of the world waiting.

Which brought us neatly to Ignis the dragon, who was performing a dance and had exactly the opposite problem.

Ignis was a perfectionist. He could not possibly begin until every dance move was perfect.

“When does perfectionism become an excuse?” I asked.

“Almost immediately,” said the Mayor.

Apparently there is no such thing as absolute perfection. Something can always be improved. Ignis therefore had to accept that when seven o’clock arrived, whatever state his dance happened to be in at that moment was the dance he had.

It might be better tomorrow. It might be spectacular next year.

At seven o’clock tonight, however, that was it.

I had several more questions prepared for Ignis, but the Mayor’s answer accidentally dealt with most of them.

“You asked an imperfect question,” he informed me, “and you got the perfect answer.”

Very convenient.

I did manage one more. What if Ignis was late because he had stopped to help another contestant?

That earned him brownie points for being a good creature, but no extra time. At the end of the day, this was still a competition.

May the best creature win.

Our third contestant was Kevin, a monster magician with eight tentacles and a slightly difficult relationship with authority.

Kevin’s position was simple: time is an imaginary concept. Therefore, the rules of time should not apply to Kevin.

I knew immediately that the Mayor was going to enjoy this one.

“He’s not wrong.”

Of course he wasn’t.

Intellectually, Kevin might have had a point. Unfortunately for him, everybody else had agreed to participate in this imaginary concept too. We had clocks, schedules and a talent show that was supposed to start at seven. Kevin could establish his own time zone in his own little empire if he wanted, but at Fruitloop University he had to toe the line.

So I tried another approach.

“If Kevin makes the clock disappear, does the deadline disappear too?”

No.

Apparently there are other clocks.

Kevin would have to make all of them disappear, which was going to turn a short magic act into a fairly ambitious project.

Then he invented something much more dangerous: an alarm clock that allowed you to sleep for another five minutes without being late. There was, naturally, a catch. Every time you pressed snooze, the clock stole five minutes from somebody else’s day.

“Would you use it?”

The Mayor sighed.

“I hate the answer. It depends.”

Of course it did.

It depended on whose five minutes he was stealing. If it was somebody he knew, there was a problem. If it was a complete stranger somewhere on the planet, apparently we had entered a slightly greyer ethical area.

If it was a complete stranger somewhere on the planet, apparently we had entered a slightly greyer ethical area.

But after a bit of wandering around that particular moral swamp, he arrived at the question that mattered: why should he take five minutes from somebody else simply because he had failed to organise himself?

Somewhere between Kevin’s imaginary clocks and his stolen snooze minutes, our ridiculous talent show had stumbled into something rather less ridiculous.

Being on time is a form of respect.

Not because clocks are sacred, or because five minutes automatically ruins somebody’s life, but because the other person has a day too. They have obligations, plans and people waiting for them.

And if something goes wrong, you communicate.

I’m sorry. I’m going to be late.

That changes things.

Then came Boris.

Boris is a chef, and his talent was the ability to produce spectacular desserts within seconds. Naturally, Boris wanted to perform first. His argument was excellent: if he gave the judges dessert before everybody else performed, we would be much happier for the rest of the evening.

The Mayor immediately accused Boris of trying to exploit my sweet tooth.

I called it bribery.

Then he made what I considered a serious tactical mistake.

“A dessert is something that comes at the end.”

“Who made the rules?” I asked.

And there it was again.

The whole morning had become a conversation about rules we follow without thinking about them. Why must dessert come last? Why is seven o’clock seven o’clock? Why is fifteen minutes late unacceptable in one situation and completely normal in another?

The Mayor conceded that if Fruitloop University belonged to me, I could theoretically decree that dessert came first. People might disagree. They might think I had gone completely bonkers. But within my territory, those were the rules.

This seemed like an excellent constitutional arrangement.

Unfortunately for Boris, presidential powers did not extend to forgiving bad planning.

He arrived late because he had stopped at the supermarket for ingredients.

No.

He knew when the competition started. He knew what he needed. His inability to obtain the correct Himalayan salt from the fifteenth rock around the corner before the contest was his organisational problem.

Even chocolate could not save him.

This disappointed me slightly.

Our final contestant was Sir Wailalot, a ghostly opera singer whose songs could apparently continue indefinitely. He could not possibly be interrupted.

“What if the song lasts three hours?”

Red buzzer.

It could be beautiful. It could contain notes nobody had ever heard before. It could be his great artistic masterpiece.

Wrong venue.

Fruitloop University had a schedule.

By this point, however, the schedule itself had developed a problem. The show was advertised for seven o’clock, but everybody at the University believed that arriving fifteen minutes late was actually arriving on time.

So if nobody arrived before 7:15, were they late?

The Mayor thought about this for quite a while before deciding that everybody was, in fact, on time. Apparently seven o’clock could mean the audience should be seated by seven, ready for the highly strung artists to begin when the performance itself started a little later.

I suggested simply putting 7:15 on the invitation.

No.

Seven.

I suggested 6:45 instead.

That, apparently, was bending the rules.

I was beginning to suspect the rules were less solid than we had originally advertised.

And perhaps that was the point.

There is no universal number of minutes at which somebody suddenly becomes late. Context keeps interfering. A rocket launch has a window that cannot simply be moved because somebody had trouble finding their shoes. A coffee with a friend is different. A delayed train changes the calculation again. An emergency changes it completely.

The Mayor hated the phrase by now, but we kept returning to it.

It depends.

You do your best to arrive on time. You plan according to how important the event is. If something beyond your control goes wrong, people can be remarkably flexible.

And sooner or later, you will be the late one.

The Mayor reminded me that I once completely missed one of our own meetings because I had the time wrong. It pushed the rest of his day backwards.

We are, somehow, still speaking.

Near the end, I asked what may have been my favourite question of the morning.

“Should punctuality be part of the talent score?”

The Mayor stopped.

“That’s a brilliant question.”

“It’s a talent show,” I said. “Not a time show.”

After spending most of the morning creating rules about punctuality, penalties, disqualifications and fairness, we now had to admit that being punctual was not actually one of the talents being judged.

Eventually, the Mayor decided it should not form part of the score.

Punctuality was not the talent.

It was simply expected.

And perhaps that was the cleanest answer we found all morning. The unwritten rule is not that you must never be late. Life is far too messy for that.

The rule is that other people’s time matters too.

Do your best. Plan properly. Don’t keep people waiting merely because you believe your rainbow entrance, perfect dance move or spectacular chocolate is more important than everybody else’s day.

And when life throws one of its last-minute googlies at you, explain.

Most people will understand.

Finally, there was only the Golden Pineapple Trophy left.

Sparkles had sung. Ignis had danced. Kevin had performed his magic and attempted to dismantle time itself. Boris had produced chocolate. Sir Wailalot had wailed.

“Who wins?” I asked.

“The best one.”

“Yes. Who is the best one?”

There was a pause.

“You did.”

“I WASN’T IN THE TALENT SHOW!”

Fortunately, I had kept track of my own contestants.

After reminding my fellow judge who they actually were, we finally agreed.

Sparkles.

She was creative, authentic, a little shy, uncomfortable with too much attention, and still prepared to walk onto that stage with her rainbow entrance and sing.

So Sparkles won the Golden Pineapple.

Whether the presentation ceremony started exactly on time was, by then, completely beside the point.

In The Next Issue

Tiny Luxuries

What is your tiny luxury? Is it buying the good butter at the supermarket because you simply refuse to compromise on another brand? Taking twenty minutes to read in a quiet place? Or keeping a secret, hidden stash of your absolute favorite chocolate at the back of the cupboard?

Tiny Luxuries

We all have tiny luxuries we love, and even though we don’t always talk about them, they mean so much more to us than anyone else might think.

Fresh, crisp sheets on the bed. Crisp, clean towels hanging in the bathroom. Sitting down to a steaming hot cup of coffee. You might deeply savor these simple moments, while someone else might brush them off as unnecessary or just another daily chore on the to-do list. But to you, they change the entire mood of the day.

Join us next week in Issue 37 as we explore Tiny Luxuries: those quiet, beautiful self-indulgences that don’t cost a fortune, but make us feel rich in all the ways that matter.

Join us next week:

Monday
With Frank & Ralf – 8:00 CET
With Frank, Ismar & Ritesh – 15:00 CET
With Janita, Frank & Fabrice – 17:00 CET

Wednesday
With Frank, Martin & Manfred – 7:30 CET
With Frank & Bruce 10 CET
With Janita & Sylvie – 15:00 CET

NEW: Our Happy Hour at 17-19 CET every Wednesday.

Thursday
With Janita, Rosii & Frank, perhaps Monika & Nathalie – 10:30 CET
With Janita & Babette – 13:00 CET

Visual pauseThe Pineapple
Editorial photograph
The Pineapple · Every Friday

See what the next issue brings.

Receive The Pineapple each Friday, free and without noise.

Subscribe to The Pineapple